User talk:156.39.0.199

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vulcan (Star Trek), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vulcan (Star Trek) was changed by 156.39.0.199 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868678 on 2012-07-17T21:48:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (156.39.0.199) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! 220 of Borg 01:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --220 of Borg 02:33, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Incineration may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {For|other forms of waste plant that produces energy|waste-to-energy}
  • 2_Miljoe-tilstand/3_luft/4_adaei/doc/Poster_Eltra_PM.doc | title = PM Emission from CHP Plants < 25MW<sub>e</sub> | first1 = Malene | last1 = Nielsen | first2 = Jytte Boll | last2 = Illerup |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Definitions of Monsoon vs. Savanna Climates[edit]

The definitions given on this page are not consistent with each other. It says a tropical monsoon climate 'has its driest month seeing on average less than 60 mm, but more than 4% the total annual precipitation', which contrasts with a tropical savanna climate 'whose driest month sees less than 60 mm of precipitation and also less than 100 – [total annual precipitation {mm}/25] of precipitation.'

Those two definitions are not mutually exclusive. For example, imagine 1000mm total precip, with the driest month being 50mm. 50mm is more than 4% (actually 5%) of the total precip, so it counts as a tropical monsoon climate, but 50mm is also less than 100-1000/25=60mm, which means it would be classified as a tropical savanna climate as well. Similarly, if an area gets 2000mm of annual precip with a driest month of 40mm, it is neither monsoon (2%) nor savanna (100-2000/25 = 20mm)

There are a few logical problems here, but I think defining monsoon based on driest month >4% of annual total is the problem - that excludes climates with extraordinarily rainy wet seasons and pronounced dry seasons which the page later says are characteristic of one type of monsoon climate. If it was defined using the criteria that the driest month is greater than 100-[total/25], that would allow such climates again; places with rainfall above 2500mm annually would always be classified as tropical monsoon regardless of dry-month totals because 100-total/25 would be less than 0.

Edit - I replaced it so the definitions are consistent, but I can't verify the citation, so I don't know if that was incorrect or if it was interpreted/written on the wiki page incorrectly.

December 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of University at Albany people—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fatima Buntinx (January 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 156.39.0.199! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Society of the Snow have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 23:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]