User talk:172.58.231.77

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:172.58.231.77 reported by User:Herbfur (Result: ). Thank you. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 01:01, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

2020 United States Senate elections

Regarding this, you are completely off the track. I despise Republicans but the fact is it is 50 Republicans and 48 Democrats, with the two independents senators only giving a tie; only after her inauguration will Kamala Harris be the tiebreaker as vice president. The election is about 2020, not 2021; it is the same thing as 2000. Either the winning popular vote party goes first or the incumbent party goes first, as the incumbent vice president would be the tie-breaker; either way, this results in Democrats going first in 2000 and Republicans going first in 2020; and I do not see other parameters for which party should go first in 2000 and 2020. By the way, I do not see you reverting order for the 2000 election, as in the case in was Republicans gaining majority, so according to your own rules the Republicans should go first, if Democrats goes first too. By the way, 50 is a tie, not a win. 51 is the majority, so neither seats should be bolded. Finally, the infobox is for uncontroversial facts; it is in the body where we explain how and why Democrats gained the majority, not in the infobox. Davide King (talk) 01:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

---