User talk:192.250.175.25

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Charles Barkley has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Rror (talk) 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Sergeant[edit]

Hi, thanks for reversing edit made by anon user 122.117.239.23 on the Sergeant page. He did same on Colleen Fitzpatrick page and several others as well, all (or most) to do with same subject. I actually know who this person is, and thought he'd already been warned for vandalism (he's wiped entire articles as well). What can be done about such a person and why is their IP not banned? Can you please advise by replying on my talk page. Thanks AndreaUKA (talk) 22:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assume you don't want to advise then? AndreaUKA (talk) 22:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hate crime hoaxes[edit]

The problem is that there is no such category. It appears as a red link at the bottom of articles, and that's why I'm removing it. Again. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 15:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 16:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding the category to pages. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 16:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

It's not a threat, it's a warning. As I wrote, there is no such category. Repeatedly adding the category after being asked not to is vandalism. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 17:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is a threat. It is your threat to deliberately abuse Wikipedia policy in order to gain an advantage in a content dispute. Trying to improve Wikipedia by creating a sub-category of Category:Hoaxes to note those hoaxes which specifically created the illusion that a hate crime had been committed is not vandalism; it does not become vandalism simply because you dislike the idea of such a sub-category. Your claims that you will get me blocked for vandalism are, in the most charitable possible interpretation, bullbaloney; in a less charitable interpretation it is not merely baloney but an deliberate attempt to win a content dispute through appeal to force. I am afraid that the length of time you have been on Wikipedia counts very much against you; within the first year of editing you surely would have learned the difference between vandalism and a content dispute. -- 192.250.112.194 (talk) 12:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

#5 vandal warning, for Santa Fe, NM, multiple offenses[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Pete Tillman (talk) 21:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hair conditioner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Callanecc (talk) 15:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marian Rivera. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Marian Rivera. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ... discospinster talk 23:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sachin Tendulkar alla  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 12:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sachin Tendulkar alla may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{film

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:57, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Travis Scott have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU () 17:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Whataboutism— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 19:18, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]