User talk:208.105.149.80

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Someone using this IP address has made unhelpful edits to the page Same-sex marriage, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you need help see:

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Spotfixer (talk) 00:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

edit summarys[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Same-sex marriage. Thank you. -- The Red Pen of Doom 22:43, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This IP Address Is NOT Being Used By Skoojal[edit]

Your word isn't good enough, just wait for the SPI report to come clean. Look at it this way, if you're not a sockpuppet, you have nothing to worry about. Until then, the tag stays.— dαlus Contribs 23:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I couldn't care less about whether the tag is there or not. 208.105.149.80 (talk) 23:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But to the point, the original tag on your other IP address was added by an admin, so, whether you aren't a sock, or whether you are, is still up for debate until the sockpuppet investigation comes back positive or negative.— dαlus Contribs 23:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be engaged in edit warring across multiple pages. It is incredibly disruptive and can result in a block. If there are controversial issues, use the talk pages to discuss them rather than just reverting another editor's edits. Grsz11 18:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not so. I have not violated WP:3RR even once, and I defy you to come up with a single instance where I have done so. You have reverted sourced material on the Kevin Jennings page. I believe your edit was off base, and I am completely within bounds to challenge you. Your accusations are untrue and misleading. In an effort to assume good faith, I will stop short of speculating as to the motives behind your edits. One question: Did you "clear" your reverts on the talk page before making them? If not, why do you expect me to do so?

208.105.149.80 (talk) 19:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]