User talk:2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:C3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mariposa War— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 03:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Avedis Zildjian Company— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Non-Dropframe talk 23:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at INXS. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 04:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Andritolion. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Orlando Anderson— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. andritolion (talk) 02:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 02:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that repeatedly triggered the edit filter. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]