User talk:45.7.161.77

April 2022

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Persephone, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 20:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Hi 45.7.161.77! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Persephone several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Persephone, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. NebY (talk) 17:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Proserpina shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NebY (talk) 22:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your identity

Hi, are you the editor who also identifies theselves as Aizen? You seem to have 2 or so Wikipedian identities, in addition to this original un-named IP account, and it's difficult to trace your contributions to particular articles and talk-page discussuions. Could you please use one signature, and one account, and stick to them. Using several without disclosing them as yours is not useful in discussions or disputes, and could be taken as WP:Sockpuppet activity, which I'm fairly sure is not the case here. It seems more likely that sometimes you edit while logged out. I'm posting this message at your other accounts (or what I presume are yours). Thanks. Haploidavey (talk) 09:29, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

---