User talk:65.96.48.102

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Warnings[edit]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anderson Cooper 360°, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Anderson Cooper 360° was changed by 65.96.48.102 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90692 on 2012-02-04T22:37:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Anderson Cooper 360°, you may be blocked from editing. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:45, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Jasper Deng/Nonconfirmed, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:48, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

65.96.48.102 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm a little calmed down now. I feel that User:Jasper Deng has been inappropriately stalking me on this website. Perhaps I should not have made the past few edits, and I am sorry that I did. However, his behavior and his erasings of my postings regarding his behavior were completely inappropriate and should not be tolerated. Please unblock me and block him. Thank you. 65.96.48.102 (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm going to decline this unblock. Although you've only vandalized one article on the English Wikipedia, your behavior in user talk space and Wikipedia space shows you do not understand what harrassment is and that you intend to continue vandalizing. Your edit summary here also shows you plan to continue claiming to be harrassed and you do not understand what it is about your behavior that has earned the block. See WP:NOTTHEM. v/r - TP 23:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • No, cross-wiki vandalism is not tolerated.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Also, if you contunie to revert comments about your block on your talk page and claim harrassment in edit summaries, you may find your talk page access revoked.--v/r - TP 23:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page Mombasa with this edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:HiLo48 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Acalamari 20:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what "policy" says[edit]

Re. this edit - "You may not erase warnings, per Wikipedia policy" - I'm not sure what policy you're thinking of, but WP:REMOVED clearly states that users are at liberty to remove material from their own Talk page. (There are exceptions but they're not relevant here.)

That policy also clearly states that restoring talk page notices is not a listed exception to the three-revert rule. Repeatedly restoring your message to HiLo48 as you did would've been enough to earn you a block, even if you hadn't managed it for other reasons. --GenericBob (talk) 22:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lynn Woolsey, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lynn Woolsey was changed by 65.96.48.102 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863905 on 2012-02-15T20:57:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Chris Matthews, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 03:20, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories, you may be blocked from editing. If you believe there are reliable sources, which allow your claims regarding Obama to be included without violating WP:NPOV and WP:FRINGE, but which are being suppressed without valid reason, bring it up at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard (WP:RSN). Anything going on at pages related to 9/11 has no bearing at Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories, and the current "discussion" is out of order per WP:NOTAFORUM unless it leads to genuine improvement of this article.Richwales 07:23, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 15:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.