User talk:68.193.160.90

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


July 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Scream 4 have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Scream 4 was changed by 68.193.160.90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874848 on 2021-07-04T12:26:29+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:26, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I've Done.) 21:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ifnord (talk) 22:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  • I see you have problems with edit warring, and since you are also on the verge at Template:The Doors, its only fair to issue a final warning. Please read and understand WP:BRD. Jusdafax (talk) 03:39, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Christy Carlson Romano, you may be blocked from editing. --IJBall (contribstalk) 22:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Christy Carlson Romano. --IJBall (contribstalk) 23:26, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2021[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas & Friends (series 1)‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Can't be removing cite tags for unsourced content. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 21:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Thomas & Friends (series 1), you may be blocked from editing. You're still removing the cite tags for no reason. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clear Light[edit]

Please don’t empty categories out of process, take them to CFD. Per WP:ALBUMSTYLE, “Previous discussions have formed the consensus that a category for an artist's albums should be created even if they have only released one album.” Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 05:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Saved by the Bell: The New Class shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --IJBall (contribstalk) 14:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

MOS:POSS[edit]

Hi. Please read MOS:POSS. It very clearly explains why your edits on Homer's enemy are wrong. If you continue to make the edits, you risk being banned and/or a check user.NEDOCHAN (talk) 11:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3 month block[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 03:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 16:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]