User talk:78.151.17.77

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chelsea F.C.[edit]

Please start a discussion on the seasonal page for addition of initial and total fee columns to the talk page before adding to the article. Words in the Wind(talk) 19:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will follow your lead. But you must admit that transfer fees have become much more complicated than even 5 years ago. Whereas the details of add-ons are quite secretive, the total fee and initial fee are generally published (if anything is published). I propose that both initial and total fee should be there, since we know the "real" fee paid will be somewhere in between those amounts. 78.151.17.77 (talk) 19:47, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Information icon Hi 78.151.17.77! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of M3GAN several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:M3GAN, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 11:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Several? Such an abuse of English words. I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of M3GAN several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable. 78.151.17.77 (talk) 12:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
The issue here is making the same edit more than once without discussion. If you make an edit and someone reverts, you must discuss on the talk page before making the edit again. You didn't even give an edit summary to explain why you were making the edit more than once. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Failing to discuss is not an option. I gave you the "softer" version of the editing warring template to help you avoid getting into an edit war. If you continue reverting, someone will give you a stronger warning, and then eventually you'll lose your editing privileges if you continue reverting. Sundayclose (talk) 12:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]