User talk:82.27.217.102

December 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Temple of Eshmun, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Dear editor, you will adhere to the Dates and numbers style guidelines . This is a featured article that has come through a lot of iterations to reach this level. This article is based on scholarly sources therefore it was seen best to use Common Era for era style. Thank you for not reverting to the Western Dionysian era system. I invite you to start an account and be more familiar with editing guidelines before making changes to stable articles. Elias Z 06:46, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Projections (Star Trek: Voyager) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.

Furthermore, in accordance with the Manual of Style on punctuation spacing, there is no need to remove double-spacing after a terminal punctuation. While our featured article on the matter—sentence spacing—notes that studies have proven inconclusive; since Media Wiki only presents the reader a single-spaced product; and because double-sentence-spacing can make sentence structure more-easily parsed in a monospaced-font environment; it can be detrimental to other editors to remove such spacing. Thanks,

— fourthords | =Λ= | 19:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

---