User talk:8318

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why do people keep insisting that I'm Richard Warman? I'm sure he has better things to do than to write articles for Wikipedia. AnnieHall 16:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well no. Richard Warman does 3 things on any given day...1:Surf the net looking for 'victims'. 2:Posting under female names on Wikipedia. 3: Sitting in posh hotels playing his weeping violin in CHR cases.

The ARA already has a substantial article and there's really nothing much for me to contribute. I'm not really aware of individual members of the ARA and there's not a great deal of credible information (NPOV) online for me to use in such an article should I even think about writing one. And yes, my focus is on the far right in Canada since it's a part of a history and cultural scene that's often overlooked by the mainstream. The ugly underbelly if you will. My choice of subjects not a conspiracy and it's nothing personal even though you seem to have taken it as a personal affront, but you might be very happy to know that there are a few non-political articles I'd like to do in the near future too. AnnieHall 01:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's really not that hard to find the information I use to write my articles. They're all found online and I show where I get my sources either in the article itself as endnotes or by providing external links. For some of the earlier members of the right like Wolfgang Droege or Don Andrews I might also leaf through Warren Kinsella's book Web of Hate which might be a bit sensationalistic in parts but does provide a decent background. My own personal background is fairly extensive simply because I've made it a point to learn about this aspect of Canadian society. I happen to find it very interesting even while I disagree with the ideas expressed by those who espouse them.

Now the claim that I'm one sided is likely true at least when you're talking about my focus. There are people on Wikipedia who devote themselves to Pokemon articles to tell you how specific people are when they decide to contribute to the project. I've decided to focus on the far right in Canada which is pretty specific but you'll have to grant more important than the variety of Pokemon monsters there are. In the articles themselves I do try to limit POV as much as I can but there's a chance that my POV might come out in the articles even if I don't intend it.

As for the people you mention (Ruttle and Ichim) I really don't have an interest in writing about them which isn't to say something shouldn't be written about them. There's nothing to stop you or anyone else from creating a Wikipedia article on them. However the articles need to be NPOV and sourced (legitimate websites primarily). Also just because someone is active doesn't mean that they are important enough to write an article about. I can't pick out any person who posts on Stormfront simply because they're outspoken and their real identity is known. What have they done or been apart of to justify a Wikipedia article?

Like I said it's nothing personal from where I stand. I'm just doing my best to document a part of Canadian subculture while the information still exists. If you have any more questions shot them my way. AnnieHall 02:32, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I posted this in my own talk page but I'll repost it here. What the hell are you talking about? Will Beback noted that some people on Stormfront were talking about an article of mine and speculating that I'm Richard Warman. When have I mentioned anything about Nathan Touchette recently? I'm really sure I haven't said anything about anyone going by the name Teardown. I also haven't said a single thing about 8318 recently and I'm not sure if I ever have. I really don't give a flying fig who you are. Get over yourself. AnnieHall 02:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Whattup Nazi Boy ;) Paul Fromm