User talk:92.249.183.225

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loreen april fools deletion discussion (April 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not an article

KylieTastic (talk) 13:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 92.249.183.225! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loreen april fools deletion discussion (April 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've already been told at WP:ANI that this isn't an acceptable April Fool's prank. You're wasting your time trying to resubmit this, and you'll end up being blocked for disruptive editing, so, please, stop. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 14:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. Joke deletion discussions are allowed. - 92.249.183.225 (talk)

Follow the rules at Wikipedia:Rules for Fools. Going via AfC would create an article, which is not an acceptable April Fool's prank. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 14:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- there's literally a WHOLE SECTION for WP:Rules for Fools#Joke deletion nominations.

Speedy deletion of Draft:Loreen april fools deletion discussion[edit]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Loreen april fools deletion discussion, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. UtherSRG (talk) 18:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 18:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.249.183.225 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My "crime" is starting a joke deletion discussion for WP:APRILFOOLS, which is allowed. Need any more proof? Look at this.

Decline reason:

You were trying to create an entity in article space, which is against the rules. Your block is only for 31 hours, which is lenient, so my advice is drop the stick, and come back with a fresh attitude once the block is over. PhilKnight (talk) 19:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

92.249.183.225 (talk) 18:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The IP has wasted too many editors' time already, so I've revoked TPA. Hopefully, 31h is long enough so they'll lose interest at the end of it.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.