User talk:94.117.6.89

April 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Etothepi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kim Delaney have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. etothepi 👽 ^(u)•(t) 23:06, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your deletion rampage and begin discussing matters on the articles' talk pages. None of the content you're deleting is particularly unusual for Wikipedia, and it's pretty standard newspaper fodder as well. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 23:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kim Delaney. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 23:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roger Clinton Jr., you may be blocked from editing. etothepi 👽 ^(u)•(t) 23:16, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please read about the bold-revert-discuss cycle. You made an edit. Other editors disagreed with your edit. You should now discuss the edit on the article's talk page. If you do, you edits may be accepted. If you do not, your edits will not be accepted, you'll probably be blocked, and the article may be locked down. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jackie Warner. Not liking a particular piece of information does not make it any less true or relevant etothepi 👽 ^(u)•(t) 23:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Jackie Warner, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you affiliated in any way with the people whose articles you are blanking?[edit]

If you are paid / receiving any kind of compensation for doing these edits, you are required by our terms of service to disclose this. It does not mean that your edits are wrong -- those that I have seen actually appear to be reasonable, and I have not undone them. However, please disclose any affiliation to the article subjects before continuing to edit. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:47, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Edit warring"[edit]

As you have been told multiple times, there is nothing wrong with removing unsourced material. But please post a discussion on the article talk page before you do so. Such changes should be done by community consensus, not unilaterally by an IP account. If you really do have good things to contribute, Wikipedia will welcome you, but only if you go about doing so properly. etothepi 👽 ^(u)•(t) 23:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. We'll gladly welcome any contributions you make in good faith, especially when it comes to improving citations (a particular bugbear of mine, I admit), but attacking established editors as "eggheads" who don't know policy isn't exactly the best approach to improving an encyclopedia. We can hash things out on the talk page, and discussions do get lively, but personal attacks will get you nowhere. — Javert2113 (talk) 00:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.