User talk:ALLNP
Welcome![edit]
|
Good start on the article - could I suggest using Jong Soo Park as an example template to make it more in line with Wikipedia guidelines.Peter Rehse (talk) 11:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
I put in an info box and changed the first line a tad. It reads better now so I removed a couple of tags - the orphan one remains but that can also go if you add him to the List of taekwondo grandmasters where I think he will fit. Cheers.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:22, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Laughs - those tables can be real cows - let me try for a moment. By the way please sign your posts us described below. Easy for me to track.Peter Rehse (talk) 13:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
OK Done - you will need to edit the description all I have put in is the word American. Please replace that with an appropriate short description.Peter Rehse (talk) 13:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
This is looking good - I would promote it to C class if you can expand the info-box with a picture. Pictures are a bit difficult as they are a bit particular about copyright. Cheers. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Take a look at the Talk Page of the article. The different projects are classed based on content. You have almost enough well referenced content for the articles to move up from a Start class to C. Not so important really but it does keep track of an articles history. From C we move to B to GA (Good article) to FA (Featured article) each progressively tougher. Taekwondo has so far only made it to B whereas by way of example Aikido is FA. That (personal experience) took rounds of Peer Review and was not easy. If you put up pictures just make sure you fill in the copyright form - then no problem.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
In my opinion - besides getting the infobox and the picture - leave it alone for a bit. It just may grow - in fact the best articles have a good start (this one does) and multiple contributors. The classes have only partly to do with quality - some subjects wont proceed beyond C because of their material. I just think that C is a nice line to get over.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
December 2013[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Davidovich Bagels may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- process was featured on the popular Travel Channel program, [[Bizarre Foods with Andrew Zimmern]]]<ref>{{cite web|last=Zimmern|first=Andrew|title=NYC Overnight|url=http://www.travelchannel.com/tv-
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:14, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
August 2014[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Massacre of Kalavryta. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 08:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
This article was proposed for deletion in April 2016. As of July 2019 Taekwondo Life Magazine has been in print and Digital in 144 Countries with a worldwide readership in 1000's. We have interviewed major martial arts celebrities and been part of the Press Corp for significant events likes UFC, US Olympic Trials, Bellator MMA and movie premiere's for major studios. I am suggesting that it would an appropriate time to add this listing. Is that acceptable?
Proposed deletion of Tae Kwon Do Life Magazine[edit]
The article Tae Kwon Do Life Magazine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No independent sources. Too young to be notable yet. Does not meet WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 08:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
The article has been further cited, evidencing it's legitimacy and credibility. Once the 1st issue comes out it can be further, specifically, referenced. ALLNP
Nomination of Tae Kwon Do Life Magazine for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tae Kwon Do Life Magazine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tae Kwon Do Life Magazine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, ALLNP. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 14[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of health and fitness magazines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Belt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, ALLNP. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, ALLNP. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Tildes in edit summaries[edit]
Hello,
I've noticed you're adding four tildes ( ~~~~ ) in your edit summaries. As far as I know, we only actually use the tildes outside of articlespace, as they expand to a signature when writing a comment. I don't think they do that in edit summaries; as such, an edit summary with four tildes just has those raw four tildes.
Best, Lkb335 (talk) 01:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- I apologize- I understood this as protocol. So what is required in that box other than a summary? Thank you ALLNP (talk) 01:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)