User talk:Aaron Bruce/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Welcome!
Hello, Aaron Bruce, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - Darwinek 23:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Fox Products Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 18:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help on the article. To answer your Q, I'm pretty sure "analagous" isn't en-uk or en-anything else. I think it's the product of spelling using the "sound-it-out" method while simultaneously mispronouncing the word in question...it does make me wonder how many times I've misspelled it before though... thanks agin—Turangalila talk 22:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletes
I would like to ask you your rationale for adding speedy-delete nominations for various Division I-A marching band pages. -- Upholder 19:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
re: comment
- Why did you delete the comment I left?
I was just following instructions... according to some high-tech scheme I know nothing about, this user wanted his talk page restored after every comment. See? — Xiutwel (talk) 08:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Wow...
No problem at all ! — Xiutwel (talk) 13:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, but..
Who will make decision about slavian barbarians trying to destroy Red army crimes in Lithuania? This is only knowlidge (zero emotions) - only historical facts and wikipedia is collection of knowlidge and facts, but some nationalist from slavian countries are going to destroy facts and to hide real history of Red army - so they are according to the rules of wiki real barbarians and vandals who supports criminal activities. This is very nice case for the court!
Ttturbo 18:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
ISUCF"V"MB
We need to clean up the page since it's been reinstated. I think that the "Traditions" section needs a lot of work. It seems to me that the reason the page was marked for deletion in the first place was because of the unnecessary info in the "Traditions" section. I'll keep my eye on the page and see what I can do.
Davidmarkman 18:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Bassoonists
Hi, thanks for that! I have also done some work on Recorder players, and today worked on "Saxophonists" and "Bass guitarists". In addition I have pointed the "Professional" label on the appropriate template to the correct wikipedian intrumentalist level 4 category, before it pointed to an article on "Professional" which seemed both a little pointless and inconsistent with the other 3 levels. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Fox Products Corporation
A tag has been placed on Fox Products Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Socrates2008 (Talk) 12:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Fox Products Corporation
An editor has nominated Fox Products Corporation, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Products Corporation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)