User talk:Abitofmoonlight

This account has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser evidence confirms that the account's owner has abusively used multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets · sockpuppet investigations casepage)

May 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Mkdw. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Deborah Solomon because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mkdw ^talk 20:31, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deborah Solomon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 01:17, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Mkdw ^talk 16:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Deborah Solomon. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mkdw ^talk 17:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The details of your block can be found at Talk:Deborah Solomon. Regretfully, Mkdw ^talk 18:14, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block increased to indefinite following Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abitofmoonlight. Mkdw ^talk 14:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]