User talk:AceYYC/Archive2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Running Man Barnstar
I hereby award you the Running Man Barnstar for always keeping the Football Portal news up to date! -- Elisson • Talk 09:51, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
Hello.
I apologise for 'spamming' your talkpage like this, but you was so helpfull to leave comments when the article on the Krag-Petersson was listed on WP:FAC. Since I've just nominated it for FAC, I would be gratefull if you could take the time to look it over and leave a comment at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Krag-Petersson.
Thank you for your time
WegianWarrior 09:01, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | The image Image:Cyhz1.png has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. If you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, please provide the necessary information. |
Football featured article
Hi,
I put Denis Law on WP:FAC a few weeks ago, but its nomination failed, partly because the images were not fully tagged and partly because only three people voted in total. I'm intending to put it up again in a few days once I've sorted the images out, so I was wondering if you could make it the football featured article at the time to draw a bit more attention to it. Plus, it's a hell of a good article, even if I say so myself :-)
CTOAGN 16:13, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
MOND
I've tried my bewst to address the objections. Please leave your further comments.Loom91 18:49, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Loom91 05:43, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
Football portal
I've noticed you've taken it down now, but if you bring back football feature pictures, make sure to only feature free use images (GFDL, PD etc.). ed g2s • talk 18:43, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Hi. I applogies for 'spamming' your talkpage like this, but some time ago you was helpfull with comments on one of 'my' other articles on old Norwegian rifles and I wondered if you might be interested in helping out peer reviewing the article on the Kammerlader. Thank you for your time. WegianWarrior 11:29, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
At it again
I'm back at it again with my Bruce Johnson article, nominated as a FAC. He's Ohio's lieutenant governor and already at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bruce Johnson are votes opposing. I know I am a pest, but I find when I don't go out and ask folks such as yourself--you voted for my Mark Felt FAC nomination--for their votes, my FAC's invariably are defeated. So I'd be grateful if you'd put your two cents worth in. Ave! PedanticallySpeaking 18:19, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
User Categorisation
You were listed on the Wikipedia:List of Caribbean Wikipedians page as living in or being associated with Trinidad and Tobago. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Trinidad and Tobago for instructions.--Rmky87 03:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Denis Law
Hi,
I've put Denis Law back on WP:FAC. Could you make it the Football FAC like we discussed before? Part of the reason it failed before was a lack of votes, so it would be good if as many people as possible could see it while it's on FAC.
CTOAGN 10:22, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
Per your recommendation, I bumped the resolution. It's a vector image, so if you feel it should be larger still I'm willing to save an even larger version. ericg ✈ 23:27, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Mark Felt Redux
In June you voted on the featured article candidacy of W. Mark Felt, which failed. It has now been resubmitted. In the event you would like to vote on the new candidacy, it is at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/W. Mark Felt/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 18:57, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Image:SWCHS.png has been listed as a possibly unfree image
| An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:SWCHS.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
I have removed it from Sir Winston Churchill High School, as it seems to be copyrighted by Google, and not usable, as far as I can tell. --Rob 06:10, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Article improvement drive
Hi Phoenix32,
The Football AID is restarting. The next project article is to be selected on January 1, 2006. Please look at the nominations and take part actively. Thanks. -Aabha (talk) 10:25, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikimedia Canada
Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Soyuztm32.jpg
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Soyuztm32.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 19:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
You recently voted oppose for this article's request to become a featured list. The main or sole reason behind your choice to oppose was that there were many red links on the article. This was in the process of being attended to by Metropolitan well before I nominated this article for FL status, so I apologize that the article was not ready to become an FL as of then. Now, though, all but a few red links have been replaced by blue links.
For the time being, your oppose vote has been stricken out because your reason for opposing has been attended to. If you still believe this article should not become a featured list, please de-strike your comment and state a new reason. If you think that because of the lack of red links, it now deserves a support vote, kindly note that below your original vote and write "support". Thank you for your vote on that page. → J@red talk+ ubx 02:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Block
I don't see where you are blocked. If you are still having trouble editing, hop over to my userpage and click "E-mail this user" on the left toolbar. Make sure you include the IP address listed on the "blocked user" page. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:33, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Requestion your Suggestions re Featured Lists
I notice you often comment on Featured List requests - I think that List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints meets the criteria; however, since I am new to that process I am asking for any advice/suggestions to identify any deficiencies prior to nomination. thx in adv. Trödel 02:29, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
FPC
Keep it nice on FPC. There is no reason to make statements like you made. It takes LITTLE of your time to make a comment on a picture, so don't be insulting. -Ravedave 06:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent-Meridian High School, I just thought you'd like to know that the consensus for deleting High School articles now appears to be swinging back in favor of deletion. So this may indicate the beginning of another campaign to remove most High School articles. Your opinion on the AfD article would be appreciated. It might be helpful if a notability standard for High Schools could be agreed upon. Thank you. — RJH (talk) 16:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Lethbridge Collegiate Institute
Nice article. Yeah I don't think it should be deleted, but then I'm an inclusionist. Thanks. — RJH (talk) 19:24, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:ABtrans.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:ABtrans.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
– ClockworkSoul 04:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For your hard work and dedication to improving Wikipedia, I, Sharkface217, hereby award you this Original Barnstar. Good job! Sharkface217 19:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC) |
Unspecified source for Image:Enmax2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Enmax2.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ccwaters 14:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Auguste_Comte.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Auguste_Comte.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Charles_Magrath.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Charles_Magrath.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
AzaBot 14:31, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Harry Potter
| Hello, AceYYC/Archive2. Over at WikiProject Harry Potter we're trying to compile a list of active participants. Your name, along with all other project participants, has been placed on the inactive list. If you'd like to get involved again, please place your name back on the active list, and take a look at the project talk page for the latest happenings. |
RHB(AWB) 23:19, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Leth51.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Leth51.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Air Canada Fleet
OOPS! LOL i didn't even notice I did that...lol sorry!!! :)? Greenboxed 15:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
Thanks for the barnstar. I appreciate the recognition. I have enjoyed working in Wikipedia and all I have been able to contribute. --Kmsiever 15:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Assessment for Francis W. Parker Charter Essential School
Thanks for adding it! --Michael WhiteT·C 23:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Reading School
Many thanks for the re-assessment of Reading School. The new assessment makes much more sense. Dahliarose 20:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, again: be bold in updating pages. You can assess articles in whatever way you please, as long as it's not ridiculous. PhoenixTwo 20:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:2005probowl.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:2005probowl.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 21:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 10 | 5 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Aviation WikiProject Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 17:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
School assessments
I'm really only arguing for some consistency for the importance ratings within the school project. I suspect that some of the recent assessments have perhaps given schools a higher importance rating than is really justified which has given rise to the current inconsistencies. I was under the impression that it is only the quality ratings which are used for the purpose of WP 1.0. The importance ratings are used only within the project. Certainly as far as English schools are concerned Reading School is one of the most important schools, both in terms of its history and also in terms of its school results. It is invariably ranked within the top 10 or 20 schools in the whole country in the school league tables. Dahliarose 15:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks for the reasssessment. I suspect that for the purposes of WP 1.0 very few schools are of any importance whatsoever as they are not core subjects for an encyclopaedia. In MS Encarta, for instance, there are very few schools worldwide with an entry, and the vast majority of them are the old English public schools such as Rugby, Harrow and Eton. So long as the importance ratings within the schools project are applied consistently then the editors for WP 1.0 will be able to make their own judgements about which schools to include. I agree that age per se should not necessarily be the deciding factor. The recent assessments do seem to have followed this guideline however. Should some of them perhaps be downgraded? I don't think a 100-year-old school should have a mid-importance rating unless there is some other feature of the school which qualifies as many UK schools are over 100 years old. Dahliarose 16:09, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Age v. Importance in assessment
First, It is my impression that quality is supposed to be assigned by global guidelines whereas importance is project to project and acts more as a roadmap for where the project's energy should go.
That said, I understand that you have qualms about assigning importance based on age of the school. I have been using this (and original patronage) as a measure as opposed to using just current achievement mostly because my impression is that a school that has been around that long had to have community and government support to do so. It is also because schools with that much history should be easy to expand and therefor could be focussed on earlier than schools with very short histories. Whether or not age is the main measure, it needs to be part of the calculation. Adam McCormick 18:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
GA Review - Aquinas College, Perth
Thank you so much for reviewing this article, it is much appreciated. Many thanks! SMBarnZy 01:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
School assessments
I imagine that as more assessments get done there will have to be quite a few articles which get downgraded or upgraded. Once all the articles have been assessed it will be easier to establish priorites and compare the relative importance of the various articles. The older schools will probably all have published histories and long lists of notable alumni so it will be easier to expand these articles and bring them up to GA or feature status. I don't know if a school's current performance should be taken into account but you might like to have a look at The Times UK school league tables[1].
In the recent batch of assessments I suspect that Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School, Blackburn has been too highly rated and should be downgraded to mid importance. Colchester Royal Grammar School should probably be high importance as, in addition to its age, it is one of an elite few UK state schools which always features near the top of the school league tables, outperforming the vast majority of private fee-paying schools. Dahliarose 10:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
WikProject Aviation Newsletter delivery
The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 18:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
College of the Holy Cross
Much appreciation for your quick and helpful review of HC. You're real big into the education, everyday life field so I'll have to look out for you in the future.
Here's what I did: I put all the link headings inside the link. You're assessment made alot of sense but if theres anything else you meant for me/us to fix, feel free to write back. Thanks! Destinvil
East Carolina University GA
Hello, Thank you for the comments. For East Carolina University to become GA, does it need to be rewritten better to become a Good Article? Do you know anyone that could help me to rewrite it, I wrote the most of it and I need new eyes. Thanks PGPirate 02:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not really, other than posting a note somewhere on Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities. Some of the prose doesn't need to be rewritten, per se...just merged and "rearranged". PhoenixTwo 02:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: Isabel
Yep, that's in the planing stage. I'm working on the final article in the series in my sandbox, and should be done... eventually. Hurricanehink (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Good article delist of BHS
I do not see a problem with moving down the rank of the article, but I am not sure if you may simply delist a GA on your own. I am asking into the matter. WhisperToMe 22:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Important!
If you did NOT go through Wikipedia:Good article review, then what you did will not count. In order to delist any article, you must go through WP:good article review. WhisperToMe 22:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
EDIT: "If you see an article on the GA list which clearly fails the criteria , you can delist it and remove it from the list at WP:GA immediately. To do this remove the GA tag on the article's talk page and put in its place DelistedGA. Do not use FailedGA."
If you can explain yourself by using this rationale for an immediate delist, this may be granted. If you do not provide an explanation, the delist shall be reverted. WhisperToMe 22:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, tell me what is wrong with it? I nominated it just to see if it would pass, since much of its material was sourced. I was the only person who participated in the discussion, and the closing admin passed it.
Since you removed the marking, the burden of proof is on you to explain why. In order to use "5", you must explain your actions. WhisperToMe 22:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Okay... formatting issues are easy to fix, so perhaps errors in formatting should be ironed out first. Does the article still violate 1c or did you fix all of the formatting errors?
As for 3...
"3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect :(a) it addresses all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FAC, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed); (b) it stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary details (no non-notable trivia)."
So, I would like to know how the article is not broad in its coverage.
Okay, so maybe the article violates "b" - But I am not quite sure what to remove. WhisperToMe 22:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Air Canada - Boeing 777 delivery schedule
I removed your external link on the 777 being delivered on March 31, 2007. It didn't link to where you expected - instead, it linked to www.airliners.net/photos/small/hotlink_big_no_no.jpg. - hotlink big no no (kinda funny) - airliner.net doesn't want hot links - Regards --Rosetown 17:51, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
|
<font=3> Thanks again for your support and comments - List of Pennsylvania state parks made featured list! Take care, Ruhrfisch 17:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|---|
Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Benjamin Franklin Tilley
I noticed that you made a minor formatting update on Benjamin Franklin Tilley and I know that you do a lot of work on WP:GAC. Since there's such a backlog there, would you have any advice for changes that I should make for when it eventually gets looked at for GA? I want to make sure, if I can, that when it does get reviewed by someone, it has a good chance of passing. Thanks! JRP 19:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC)