User talk:Agent raymond232

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Agent raymond232! Thank you for your contributions. I am DRAGON BOOSTER and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 06:53, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Serial Number 54129. I noticed that you recently removed content from Milkshaking without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hi! I see you've been welcomed. Now to advise you that editing to a political agenda is unhelpful and unnecessary. All the best! ——Serial 07:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Milkshaking shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Agent_raymond232 reported by User:Serial Number 54129 (Result: ). Thank you. ——Serial 09:13, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The report resulted in your being warned to achieve consensus before reverting. Now, please return to editing. ——Serial 09:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

——Serial 03:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

——Serial 03:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Party of Five (2020 TV series), you may be blocked from editing. — YoungForever^(talk) 23:33, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page indentation[edit]

Hey Agent raymond232! It would help a lot in your talk page discussions if you could read WP:INDENT. Especially as other editors get involved, it helps to have a visual way of knowing who's responding to who. It's also an accessibility concern. Thanks, Firefangledfeathers (talk) 21:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Talk:Black Lives Matter. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Please assume good faith. —valereee (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement[edit]

See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Agent raymond232. Kleinpecan (talk) 23:00, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:23, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, the issues are summarized at the AE request, and include personal attacks, bludgeoning of discussions, and a generally and clearly uncollaborative approach. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:25, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]