User talk:Aidyzzle

Hello me :)

Sandbox mode doesn't appear to include a 'pimp your talk page' feature, so this will have to do for now. Aidyzzle (talk) 01:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2011 Super League season results, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2011 Super League season results was changed by Aidyzzle (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925749 on 2011-06-06T02:47:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2011 Super League season results with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 03:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Stop edit warring at 2011 Super League season results. I and another admin have declined to speedy delete the article because it does not meet the criteria for a speedy deletion. If you think that the article should be deleted, then prod it or nominate it for AfD. If you continue to edit war over the article, you can and likely will be blocked from editing. -- Donald Albury 20:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per your comment at Donald Albury talk page here, do you see the two bluelinked words in his above statement? Specifically prod and AfD. Follow these links for alternatives to having the article speedy deleted. He has in fact attempted to assist you. He iro 23:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per your comment at my talk [1], can we keep the conversation here, just for the sake of having it in one place? Follow each of these blue links and there are instructions for what qualifies for them and how to proceed with them. The little blue links are more than just jargon, they link to pages that explain them. And remember, just because you want something deleted or have an opinion on something, does not mean other editors will agree with you. I know you are new(you have and will be given some leeway because of this) and all of the policies and guidelines we have can be bewildering, but it is up to you go research and read up on those policies. I'll leave you a template here with some of the more relevant ones. You can move it to your userpage if you prefer, its where I keep it. Deletion discussions, etc. have specific protocols, so please read up on them before prodeeding further with them. Hope this helps. He iro 23:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have prodded the article, I (per WP:PROD, have looked at your reasoning and contest it. Content not being up to date is not a valid reason for deletion, it would be better to research and update and expand this article rather than to delete it. If you still feel this article should be deleted rather than fixed, please see procedures at WP:AFD and proceed from there. He iro 23:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will also note that yesterday (in this edit) Julianhall also pointed you towards WP:AfD, not WP:SPEEDY. -- Donald Albury 01:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ryan Dunn, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ryan Dunn was changed by Aidyzzle (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863212 on 2011-06-20T14:56:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]