User talk:AirFrance358/archive2

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Crash the block and sockpuppet issue like airplane crashing@! (This is just for joke or ha-ha... for who think me as bad vandals.) (Seriously, IT's JOKE!)

User:Nlu, can you please not be rude...?[edit]

I'm sorry.., but many users express in that way....(also, as stated, why my attitude got little angry, is because you seems to be one-sided. I'm sorry about my attitude, however, you should not say you seem... blah blah. I'm just giving suggestion since problem is not solving. How good idea the suggestion is! It all benefits all users by solving conflicts by using evidences! I'm not trying to be one-sided. Also, I admit that Mohe is not Korean history, although it interfere with Koreans. It has no conflicts because of many evidences in the articles stating. So, this can NOTNOTNOT be case for this Balhae article. OK? --AirFrance358 22:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since, many texts in here are outdated, now, making clean-up(Or achiving.) (Is there any archive bot or template?)[edit]

Did you see what I just wrote about don't delete comments? And then you deleted a bunch.

Yes archiving is OK, but archiving is not the same as deleting. Please see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page. —dgies^t_c 20:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Gabeyc, you will be blocked from editing. Clicketyclack 21:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Case over. Simply block. OVER. SO-CALLED VANDALISM IS STOPPED. CONTESTS CONTINUE FOREVER FOREVER FOREVER UNTIL SOMEONE GIVES UP. --AirFrance358 03:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for 5 days;
Greetings, AirFrance358; unfortunately, your latest contributions to the encyclopedia have been harmful to Wikipedia, and you have been blocked from editing for a period of 5 days. Hopefully when you return your attitude to the encylopedia will have improved, and you will be prepared to contribute contructively.

If you feel this block is not justified, you may: (1) email me by clicking here, or otherwise at anthony.cfc@gmail.com; (2) add the text {{unblock|reason}} to your talk page, which you can still edit.

Blocks at Wikipedia are not a punishment - rather, they are a period to reflect, an opportunity to show understanding and and ability to act responsibly, and a period of time to let the matter pass and be learned from. Wikipedians, Administrators and the Community have a real desire for everyone who is capable of acting responsibly to be able to enjoy editing; please bear this in mind for the duration of your block.

Regards,
Anthony 21:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended[edit]

Your block has been extended to one month due to your continued vandalism. Any more and this page will be protected from your edits. --Yamla 22:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not agree with your saying of vandalism. Thanks. Also, this is MY PAGE!--AirFrance358 00:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not your page; it is Wikipedia content licensed under the GFDL. You do not own it. Its purpose is to provide support and a method of communication between your account and other members of the project. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's not I try to say.. It was normal protests. --AirFrance358 21:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AirFrance358 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No absolute reasons provided; Last contribution was replacing sockpuppet tag into suspected sockpuppet tag.

Decline reason:

As explained below, you were told not to interfere with these tags. You ignored that warning. This is about as concrete and objective as it gets. Instead of choosing to contribute to the encyclopedia positively after your block expired, you opted to ignore procedure per below. That's all there is. Unblock request denied. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were warned not to interfere with those tags, it was explained why you shouldn't, how you could contest them on WP:ANI, and that you would be blocked if you continued. You did it and were blocked. Right after that block expired, you did it again. —dgies^t_c 02:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then. I will stop. But I will keep contesting. (I didn't think that many people are that serious... I am great joke maker, sometimes...) --AirFrance358 02:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I think one person blocked me and then again one person blocked me more..? --AirFrance358 02:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question:Why can we play with our user page or discussion page? Yes, I know this is discussion page, but because of many blocks,well, sorry about that.. (It's purely joke most of time except the case of Nlu, but...). --AirFrance358 02:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reason..[edit]

The reason why I wrote something in talk page is because even my user page is blocked to edit.

Hey...[edit]

Also, I DID CONTRIBUTE POSTIVELY TO WIKIPEIDA. I DIDN'T NEGATIVELY TOUCH WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE! IT IS ONLY USER PAGE. DOES IT MATTER TO WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE. ALSO, I NOW STOPPED AND DECIDED TO IGNORE THE TAG OF SOCKPUPPET.

See also[edit]