User talk:AlDafna

April 2011[edit]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 21:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been disrupting the Martin Hirsch page by using multiple accounts to re-add the same material against consensus.

I am blocking this account as a sockpuppet. I believe this account may be a sock of a more established user; I will start an investigation into that soon, and when I do I'll post the link to the investigation on all the sock pages.

You appear to have been able to disrupt the Martin Hirsch page for quite some time; that's not going to be allowed to continue. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Erwan1972 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Floquenbeam (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlDafna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have absolutely no link with Erwan or other people. I am completely independent and I really do not understand why somebody blocks me on English Wikipedia. AlDafna (talk) 13:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While checkuser evidence remains inconclusive, I notice very strong similarities between your edits and those made by the other accounts listed at the SPI page. I find it extremely unlikely that you are different people. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 16:23, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlDafna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What I have to do ? I only have one computer and one Internet acces. How can you take a final decision to block my account ? So many differents people where block about this guy on French Wikipedia. I am editing since several months on French Wikipedia without any problem. If you are not sure about the checkuser why you would not give me a chance ?--AlDafna (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your edits to Martin Hirsch make it quite clear that you've been abusing multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not remove denied unblock requests. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]