Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Thomas Gay. This is much appreciated, but unfortunately your repair was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's page history to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you. Aurictalk 18:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I reverted your edit, changing it back to "Gay," which seems to be his name. Sorry, didn't mean to tag it as "vandalism." I think that the automated vandalism-fighters are red-flagging both "Weed" (not his name) and "Gay" (which is his name). Coretheapple (talk) 19:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Thomas Gay. This is much appreciated, but unfortunately your repair was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's page history to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you. Auric talk 18:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)