User talk:AlaskaArticleEditor315

Kidwell Covered Bridge
Kidwell Covered Bridge
Official name	Kidwell Covered Bridge
Other name(s)	Monserat Bridge
Characteristics
Design	Covered bridge
Material	Wood
History
Constructed by	August Borneman
Construction end	1880

Welcome![edit]

Hello, AlaskaArticleEditor315, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! AR.00148 (talk) 19:58, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subpages[edit]

Subpages: User:AlaskaArticleEditor315/sandbox User:AlaskaArticleEditor315/U.S. Route Idea

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi AlaskaArticleEditor315! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:35, Sunday, May 3, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

You are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! AlaskaArticleEditor315, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist Those accounts were simply created as a reference of a block. They are not sockpuppets. I have not made any edits on those accounts besides the userpage and talk page.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlaskaArticleEditor315 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Erm, what bad edits have I done..? EDIT: I created those two accounts as examples for new administrators and such as to what a block should look like. The accounts were not meant for vandalism and were going to be just left alone after I created the examples. Refer to contributions on both accounts for evidence. I was only trying to be helpful.

Decline reason:

Well those were completely unnecessary; we don't need "examples" from you. Your actions required administrators to act, thus disrupting the project. only (talk) 10:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlaskaArticleEditor315 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now understand what you mean by it disrupting the project. I completely forgot that it would waste the administrators' time. I promise to not do anything like this again, and will do constructive edits. AlaskaArticleEditor315 (talk) 14:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CheckUser Confirmed sockpuppet of TZLNCTV (talk · contribs). —DoRD (talk) 16:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fine. I admit, I am TZLNCTV. I was looking to edit for good purposes, and I originally created this account for a fresh start on WikiVoyage. When I had seen my talk page access was revoked and all my appeals were denied, I got an email about "Standard Offer". I looked and it said SIX MONTHS OF NO EDITING. I created this account only to try to make constructive and good faith edits. I created the two Example accounts not as sockpuppets but as a reference on what a block should look like. If it was unintentionally vandalism, I really am sorry for that. I was only trying to help with examples.

By the way, I did not intend for any sort of sockpuppetry or any vandalism. If this is about my Sur La Route edits, I was only trying to help then, as well. -- Wellington10232 / TZLNCTV / AlaskaArticleEditor315

What you did about the Example sockpuppets were just sleeper interactions. According to Wikipedia:Sleeper account, a sleeper account can only remain unblocked if it is in good standing, which is not the case for both accounts. --TL22 (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TL22 Would you please explain a bit more?--AlaskaArticleEditor315 (talk) 01:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlaskaArticleEditor315 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to be helpful, but apparently it acted to the contrary. I apologize for the accounts and on my old account, TZLNCTV, I did make huge mistakes. I overlinked a page on purpose using my alternate account Ironyx64, venting my anger on Wikipedia, and I realized it to have been wrong. When I was blocked, I lied about my sockpuppets and so my talk page access was blocked. I had used the common "My little brother did it" excuse, which was the wrng way to go about it. Before the sockpuppet incident on TZLNCTV, I had been making good edits, and before this small incident on this account, the same. Other than the two Example accounts, all of my edits had been constructive and in good faith. I was trying to be helpful but I overlooked the fact that it would send a moderator investigation through the examples. I was trying to keep out of trouble as much as possible, and was using factual information in my edits. If you want to see other edits, look in my Contributions on WikiVoyage. I also added the Solomon Airport FAA photo to two pages. I will do my best to stay out of any sort of trouble if I am unblocked, and for that matter, while I am blocked. Thank you for reading this. AlaskaArticleEditor315 (talk) 00:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am turning off talk page access here. If you wish to edit this site you will need to go back to your original account, and follow the instructions under the block notice on that talk page. Peripitus (Talk) 10:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Working on article (please do not revoke talk access)[edit]

The Kidwell Covered Bridge is a bridge in Athens County, Ohio.

Orphaned non-free image File:Influence-Franco.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Influence-Franco.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]