User talk:Albertcobo

Please stop adding material to 3D television that is not specifically about television. There are other articles for 3-D film and stereoscopy. hbent (talk) 00:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cuestione SG06.128[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cuestione SG06.128 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 10:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3D television[edit]

If you're going to insist on the content I removed being included in this article, please rewrite it so it makes sense. It's obviously been written by a non-native speaker and is largely non-parseable, among plenty of other problems - spelling mistakes, run-on sentences, dangling modifiers, POV problems, etc.. As it is now, the content is so confusing, it's better left out entirely. If it can't be fixed, I'm going to remove it all again. Majorclanger (talk) 17:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm going to re-revert again - large chunks are a copyright violation of www.ijsselsteijn.nl/papers/SPIE_ITCOM_2002.pdf. Majorclanger (talk) 17:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Albertcobo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mattie ^TK 17:23, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You know...[edit]

... if you'd actually fix the tone problems and provide inline citations as requested, we could get off of this asinine merry-go-round. 65.161.114.224 (talk) 21:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

... and ignoring the talk page and using an IP to do your revert aren't going to help. If you'd participate a bit and address the problems, we could stop wasting time on this. 65.161.114.224 (talk) 00:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scanned retina beam monocle[edit]

Hi! I saw that you copied the content of Virtual retinal display to Scanned retina beam monocle. I have redirected scanned retina beam monocle back to virtual retinal display – take a look at the source to see how I did it (you can read more at WP:R if you're interested). Let me know if you have any questions, THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 23:34, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I advise you to stop edit waring with the anonymous editor on virtual retinal display. Edit waring does not accomplish anything. Wikipedia has a policy, the three-revert rule, which forbids making more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. This appears to have been going on for a few days so you really need to stop immediately and discuss (otherwise you could end up being given a short block). Again, I'm open to any questions you may have. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 23:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the issues regarding Virtual retinal display on the talk page. Because of a slow-moving edit war on this article, I have protected it for a short period so that each of the parties involved can discuss the issue(s) on the article's talk page. Mind matrix 16:51, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion belongs on the article's talk page, not mine. The issue is not about the factual accuracy of the article. The problems, as originally noted by the original reverter, are enumerated on the talk. 65.161.114.224 (talk) 14:57, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in MEMS scanner[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on MEMS scanner, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because MEMS scanner is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting MEMS scanner, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:10, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3DTV[edit]

Dear Albertcobo

We are students at the Jerusalem College of Technology, Israel, currently studying Management and Marketing Technology. In the curriculum, we are participating in a course called "Technological Forecasting". In this course we are researching the technology and marketability of Stereoscopic Vision (three-dimensional TV without glasses). We would greatly appreciate if you could help us by answering several questions on the subject (we saw your contribution to the relevant article):

• Do you think that Stereoscopic Vision technology is viable and worthwhile?

• What are the chances of this technology penetrating today's market, and the chances for future success?

• Who are the competitors? Are there substitutes technologies?

• What are the advantages and disadvantages of existing Stereoscopic Vision technology?

• With which market segments will this technology make the greatest inroads?

And finally, we would appreciate if you can share with us some of your ideas and general thoughts about the future of this technology.

We greatly appreciate and thank you in advance for your time and any assistance you may offer.

Orley, Shira, Oreal, and Efrat. Third year students at Jerusalem College of Technology, Israel

Management and Marketing Technology — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.151.41.122 (talk) 21:10, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]