User talk:AlexHilzim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to String (music)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at String (music), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nyook 06:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at String (music), you may be blocked from editing. Nyook 06:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Nyook 06:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Panic! at the Disco have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch 02:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Panic! at the Disco. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch 02:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question what was libelous about the claims why did you change the fact I had nicole row replace dallon weekes on live which is true. Also panic was a band in 2018 brendon urie and Kenneth Harris contributed creatively then harris was kicked out AlexHilzim (talk) 02:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also that's what happened to Harris on other panic at the disco Wikipedia it says the same thing AlexHilzim (talk) 02:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From BLP: "Contentious material about living persons ... that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion". This is a serious libel, and no, it is not my job to go and verify if it was true. (CC) Tbhotch 02:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, can you stop introducing your opinion on Panic!? This is an encyclopedia, not your personal blog. Unsourced content, unsourced opinions and unsourced "he said, she said" is against Wikipedia's policies. (CC) Tbhotch 02:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I've never put down my opinion on panic at the disco only the facts I'm new at this how do I add the sources too them AlexHilzim (talk) 02:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Everything I put down their are sources for them just how do I add them that's all I'm asking AlexHilzim (talk) 02:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added source for the allegations about Kenneth Harris is our references while for what dallon said about ian Crawford the YouTube link was not working AlexHilzim (talk) 02:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow WP:BRD and consider proposing your additions on the talk page first. Thank you. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Panic! at the Disco. Larry Hockett (Talk) 03:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I'm new to this I added the sources threatening to block me is really messed up AlexHilzim (talk) 03:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]