User talk:AlexTrevex

August 2017[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. $ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it.$ 00:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit the comments of other editors to make them say the opposite of what they meant. There are a very limited number of circumstances in which the comments of other edits can be fiddled with (see WP:TPO), and that's not one of them. If you continue to do that, it's very likely that an admin will block you from editing as a disruptive editor. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Put this skepticism in your ass" [1] is not an acceptable talk page comment. Please see WP:CIVIL. Continuing to make comments of this sort is another pathway to being blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, the purpose of an article's talk page is to discuss with other editors how the article can be improved. It is not there for the purpose of discussing the underlying subject matter, or for expressing your opinions about it. Every single one of your talk page edits has been simply an expression of your opinion, which means that they can be removed at any time by any editor as inappropriate. If you have helpful suggestions for how an article can be improved, they are welcome, but in the future, now that you've been informed of our policy, your opinions will be removed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:07, 9 August 2017

Remove what you want the skeptics, and skepticism.And you continue to live in error. And you are lead people to confusion. You think very wrong and destructively for wikipedia. So much in the topic.
Manager AlexTrevex, 9 August 2017, 12:19 (CEST, Europe, Poland)

Well, I'm taking you at your word, and I'm removing all your edits that haven't already been removed or responded to by other more reality-oriented editors. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What your will give removal and how is sense well I have right and good writing. Reincarnat is true and a fact no just opinion clown. AlexTrevex (talk) 17:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled in here by accident, but now that I'm here I'm moved to ask: If someone dies and is reincarnated, is it some form of puppetry for them to resume using the account created in their former life? I could see arguments for them being forbidden to resume using it, as well as arguments for being required to continue using it. E Eng 03:34, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would all depend on whether the reincarnated person had memory of their previous life. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What if they remember editing WP, but can't remember their password? E Eng 04:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That may be a sign of In Reincarnate Delicto Syndrome, and the person should see their meta-physician. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. $ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it.$ 19:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:55, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you because your account seems to be used solely to post your own opinions on talk pages. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a web forum to discuss pseudoscience. There are other websites where you debate these topics. If you intend to contribute to Wikipedia and not use it as a soapbox, you can make an unblock request. For the reviewing admin: see this discussion. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:03, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I agree. OK. AlexTrevex (talk) 17:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 30267[edit]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

AlexTrevex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #30267 was submitted on 2020-04-23 18:41:21. This review is now closed.

--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 19:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]