User talk:Ally1023

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nice work![edit]

The Original Barnstar
You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more.

Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Ally1023 (talk) 07:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ally1023, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Ally1023! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Ally1023. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Anon126 (talk - contribs) 23:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at AfC Topothesia was accepted[edit]

Topothesia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your article being accepted![edit]

I've taken a look at your article, and I've made a few improvements. However, I'd ask that you take a second look at some of your references:

  • References to the Online Etymology Dictionary don't refer to the specific entry where the information is found, and I can't seem to figure them out. I've marked these like this:
{{sfn|Etymology|2014|loc=<!-- Specific entry -->}}{{nonspecific|date=March 2014}}

You'll notice I converted this to another shortened footnote. You can replace &lt;!-- Specific entry --&gt; with the name of the entry. After you've done that, you can remove {{nonspecific|...}} (which is a tag marking an issue).

  • I'm not sure which "Oxford Dictionary" you've cited. You can go down to the "References" section, where I've converted this into a {{cite encyclopedia}} reference, and fill in the information. (Don't worry about the "encyclopedia" bit; this is for dictionaries, too.) After this is fixed you can remove {{full|...}} (another issue-marking tag).

If you don't feel like addressing these issues, that's fine. Wikipedia is voluntary, and perfection is not required. Thank you for your contributions! Anon126 (talk - contribs) 07:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]