User talk:Alterdoppelganger

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Pamela Geller appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 06:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Please discuss your edits to Pamela Geller on the article's Talk page. To come in and start making non-supported claims is not the way to work in a consensus manner on Wikipedia. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 06:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

I will ask you once again to discuss your changes on the article's Talk page. If you refuse to do so, I will be forced to begin the dispute resolution process with you. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 06:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#User:Alterdoppelganger_at_Pamela_Geller. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 06:31, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Pamela Geller

Please note that you are close to violating the three-revert rule on this article. Also, your edits are removing sourced information and replacing it with unsourced opinion. Such edits may be perceived as vandalism. If you believe the article is unfair to Geller, it is best to discuss it on the talkpage before making sweeping changes. Black Kite (t) (c) 06:38, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for using multiple accounts at Pamela Geller. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 06:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)