User talk:AngelicaDos

This is AngelicaDos's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: OceanFirst Bank (December 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OceanFirst Bank and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OceanFirst Bank, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 20:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AngelicaDos! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering^(t) 20:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OceanFirst Bank has been accepted[edit]

OceanFirst Bank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 16:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi AngelicaDos! You created a thread called I checked out J. B. Hunt page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Americanpie1996 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Americanpie1996. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Courcelles (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, My name is AngelicaDos, and I have been an active and dedicated Wikipedia editor and reader for a considerable amount of time. I am writing to seek clarification regarding the recent block placed on my account.

I was surprised to discover that I am currently blocked from editing articles on Wikipedia. I have always approached my contributions with the utmost respect for the community guidelines and the collaborative nature of Wikipedia. I am aware that mistakes can happen, and if I have inadvertently violated any policies, I am more than willing to correct them promptly.

Unfortunately, I have not received any specific information regarding the reason for my block. I believe in the transparency and openness of Wikipedia, and I am reaching out to request details about the nature of the violation or mistake that led to the block. Understanding the specific issue will not only help me rectify any errors but also ensure that I contribute positively to the Wikipedia community in the future.

I am committed to upholding the standards and values of Wikipedia and am genuinely perplexed by this situation. I would appreciate any assistance you can provide in clarifying the circumstances surrounding my block. If there are any necessary corrections or actions on my part, please guide me accordingly, and I assure you that I will address them promptly and with a sincere willingness to learn. AngelicaDos (talk) 17:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]