User talk:Annevy Cristian

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annevy Cristian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will make helpful contributions such as translating articles into English, correcting spelling errors, adding missing information, and creating original articles.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query me!} 23:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Cosmi Corporation, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:11, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Monster Garage (video game) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 23:59, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ferrari GT 3: World Track[edit]

Hello Annevy Cristian,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ferrari GT 3: World Track for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nightenbelle (talk) 16:18, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, what should I do? Annevy Cristian (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright, seriously, are you telling me that a "description" of a radom website is copyrighted? Annevy Cristian (talk) 16:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What you need to do is not copy and paste the description of a game directly from the publisher. You need to find multiple wp:RS and then write an original description of the game and other important information. If you do not intend to actually write the article yourself, please do not create one. It is unethical and illegal to steal words someone else wrote on another website and pass them off as your own. I'm sorry if this sounds harsh, I don't mean it to- but I don't know how to be totally clear without also being blunt. Every article on WP was written by volunteers- someone took the time to craft those words and paragraphs as opposed to copying and pasting them from another website. And yes, I am telling you that a description of a raNdom website is copyrighted. Every word published anywhere is copyrighted by the person or company who created it. Nightenbelle (talk) 17:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For more information I suggest you read WP:Copyrights before creating any more articles. Nightenbelle (talk) 17:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I get it Annevy Cristian (talk) 17:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, you really don't. Deleting two words does not mean its not still a copyright violation. Please look at the changes the person after you made-Its still dangerously close to a copyright violation- but at least they put in a few of their own words. I'm still tagging the page as needing to be fixed before I mark it reviewed. If you are not willing to write an article from scratch, please do not create articles that someone else will have to come behind you and either delete or fix. Instead, you could list pages that need to be created here: WP:AFC and let someone with time and willingness create an article from scratch. I would rather see you write an article yourself though. You can do it I'm sure- and WP always needs more creators!! Nightenbelle (talk) 18:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GT Racing 2: The Real Car Experience, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fast & Furious

added a link pointing to Arcade

The Fast and the Furious: Drift

added a link pointing to Arcade

The Fast and the Furious (2004 video game)

added a link pointing to Arcade

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's good or bad? Annevy Cristian (talk) 21:36, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ford Simulator II[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ford Simulator II requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://serious.gameclassification.com/EN/games/26878-Ford-Simulator-II/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hog Farm _Bacon 14:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I'll be more careful Annevy Cristian (talk) 14:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not from that site, this in turn copies it from another Annevy Cristian (talk) 14:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ford Supercar Challenge[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ford Supercar Challenge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/ford-supercar-challenge/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hog Farm _Bacon 17:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will take it into account, thanks Annevy Cristian (talk) 19:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing[edit]

See Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. I know your recent car game articles aren't exact copies, but the phrasing is extremely close. Even if you change a word or two in a sentence, if the main body of the article is still extremely similar to that of the source, it's close paraphrasing, which Wikipedia treats as a copyright violation. Wikipedia is very strict with copyright, due to legal reasons. Technically, WP is consider to be a "commercial site", and legal courts take commercial use of copyrighted materials very seriously. Hog Farm _Bacon 17:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I get it

Annevy Cristian (talk) 19:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I solved it Annevy Cristian (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 11:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future.— Diannaa (talk) 11:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry The Annevy Cristian (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the inconvenience Annevy Cristian (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chrysler West Coast Rally for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chrysler West Coast Rally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrysler West Coast Rally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 17:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annevy Cristian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It was a mistake, I put a text should put.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. RickinBaltimore (talk) 22:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

sorry for the trouble, i just wanna do the right thing. Annevy Cristian (talk) 23:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annevy Cristian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I have been blocked, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make helpful contributions instead.

Decline reason:

To demonstrate your understanding, please specifically explain what you did wrong, how you won't do it again, and what productive contributions you wish to make. Specifically you will need to briefly explain what copyright is in your own words. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annevy Cristian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will use my own words and will copy and paste from other websites.

Decline reason:

Your answers about copyright literally include copyright violations by copying and pasting the definitions of copyright. This clearly shows you don’t understand the problem. only (talk) 23:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

will copy and paste from other websites Well, thats certainly not how this works... It may help you if you would answer these questions. Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I meant I won't do that, I forgot to put the word "not". Annevy Cristian (talk) 16:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1. An intellectual property that gives its owner the right to make copies of a creative work.

2. The content is licensed to the public under the CC BY-SA and GFDL license.

3. Content copied from other sources is not allowed because it is copyrighted.

4. Only content from other sources is allowed under copyright permission.

5. Using my own words and trying not to carbon copy from other sources to comply with wiki policies. Annevy Cristian (talk) 17:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annevy Cristian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will use my own words and will not copy and paste from other websites to comply with wiki policies.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annevy Cristian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the cause of the block, you cannot put content with "copy", I will do my best to comply with the rules.

Decline reason:

This explanation is insufficient. As previous answers to stated questions concerning copyright have included errors, I you need to include a more thorough explanation in your request. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annevy Cristian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reason for the blocking of "copyright violations", I am willing to improve and not repeat the same error, making edits with content without copyright.

Decline reason:

Declined due to lack of substantive responses to requests. Kinu ^t/_c 07:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you are unable or unwilling to provide a detailed answer as requested, I am removing your access to this page. If your request is declined, you will need to use WP:UTRS to make further appeals. Any admin may restore access without consulting me if they see good reason to. 331dot (talk) 09:55, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]