User talk:Anvarjam

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Fachsoft, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 20:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fachsoft[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Fachsoft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Fachsoft and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bagheera (talk) 20:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with Fachsoft, you will be blocked from editing. Kuru (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for spamming. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tikiwont (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Sir,I feel apology because i did not know the rules. But can you give me permission to write only introduction (of about 7 or 8 lines only} for the reputed IT company. Thank you}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Well, as per [1] you still have a serious Conflict of interest, so I'll post a standard notice as well. As I've protected the article, there is no real harm in unblocking to see if you can write write a decent draft in your userspace or want to contribute anything else.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: Tikiwont (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fachsoft[edit]

A tag has been placed on Fachsoft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 21:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought i had already protected this...Now it is. I unblocked you so that you can write am encyclopedic draft in your userspace, imasfar possible, not repost the same stuff gain.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is regarding the article 'Fachsoft' . I did not know the rules and regulations to how to post it. I apologize for it and promise you to edit that article as per your suggestion and under your supervision only. Otherwise sir you may surely delete that article.Please sir undelete that and please sir dont block it.Thank you

See above. We do this the other way round. After six creations, the article stays protected. Please read the posts about conflict of interest, our general guidelines etc. If you're still interested, you can try to reate a draft from scratch, that is neither advertisement nor infringes copyright, say at User:Anvarjam/Sandbox. The place to request a unprotection would then be WP:RPP---Tikiwont (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Please sir, let me edit the page named " Fachsoft". I want to correct it.Please i request you.}}

Please don't use the unblock template as you are not blocked from editing in general. You can correct it, but you have to understand how. At this point it is important that you read carefully what you've been told already, also using the help, and then start writing a good draft on your favorite topic that can convince me or anybody at WP:Requests for page protection to unprotect and have your draft moved there. It may even be best if you start moving around and edit something existing first to get e better understanding of how this place works. I won't be explaining this another time. Tikiwont (talk) 13:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Facsoft[edit]

Please do not add messages to my user page. The talk page is where they should go. In addition, please do not add tags to the page. Just explain what you are asking to have accomplished. With regards to you request to have the block removed, please read the above comment. It fully explains the issue, why it is currently blocked, and how to remove the block. ttonyb (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Anvarjam/Fachsoft[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Anvarjam/Fachsoft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Glenfarclas (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]