User talk:Apocheir/Archives/2023/October

One-sided information

This article seems to rely solely on either articles from the organization or a singular article from Influencewatch which means that it might not be notable enough for Wikipedia.

additionally, if you review the organizations 990 https://www.daffy.org/charities/263918445-alexander-hamilton-institute-for-the-study-of-western-civilizati-clinton-ny, you will see that it is and educational organization, not a policy organization. They do not lobby, nor do they create or draft policy or legislation. They comment on it, and produce articles and opinions on issues (some political, some are not) but that does qualify them as political a think tank. The only place that language comes from the singular Influencewatch article. Again this article seems very one-sided and not neutral. Blue2berry (talk) 23:43, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm confused whether you're defending the article or criticizing it. If you don't think the topic is notable, go ahead and nominate it for deletion, after taking the steps listed at WP:BEFORE.

The article is one-sided and not neutral because almost all the sources are directly linked to the institute. That daffy.org site is a fundraising page for the institute, which certainly isn't neutral. A form filed by the institute isn't neutral either. Your edits didn't add any reliable sources, so they didn't improve the state of the article.

Are you being paid to make these edits? Apocheir (talk) 21:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)