User talk:Armageddon Entropy

November 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to BDSM has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: BDSM was changed by Armageddon Entropy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853886 on 2015-11-04T03:13:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

BDSM article

Hi -- your edits to BDSM seem to be being repeatedly rejected by other editors. Instead of continuing the editing conflict in the article itself, I suggest that you discuss your changes first on the article's talk page, and try to achieve consensus with other editors there before proceeding further. You might want to take a look at the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle page for further information on how this process works. -- The Anome (talk) 13:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Promotional editing

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Harker School. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. ^{(talk to me) (My edits)} @ 04:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

BSDM

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at BDSM. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

Please discuss your proposed changes on the article's talk page. Multiple editors have undone your edits, and a thread has already been started on the talk page for you to contribute to. Meters (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

BDSM

You seem to be repeatedly asserting that pain is the primary feature of BDSM. Other editors have repeatedly reverted your edits, as it is clearly not, as demonstrated by their many cited sources. If you wish to continue make this assertion, Wikipedia policy requires that you must be able to support it with cites to reliable sources. Please discuss this as Talk:BDSM page before trying this again. As the commenter above says, if you continue to battle against other editors without engaging in discussion with them, you are at risk of being blocked from editing. -- The Anome (talk) 12:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent edits to Harker School

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Harker School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 04:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stanford Splash

Hello Armageddon Entropy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Stanford Splash for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Le Sanglier des Ardennes (talk) 04:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Harker School

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Harker School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 05:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent edits to Scott McNealy

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Scott McNealy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

September 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at BDSM, you may be blocked from editing. Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

This edit, in particular is nonsense. Lots of BDSM activities involve no pain at all; for example, gentle rope bondage and pet play, to name just two. -- The Anome (talk) 17:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your set of recent edits to BDSM have been reverted by another editor. Please do not add any more unsourced material to that article; given your editing history and the set of previous warnings you have been given about this, you are likely to be blocked for disruptive editing if you continue. -- The Anome (talk) 14:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)