User talk:Attractiveafrican69

January 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Imagine Dragons, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Hitro talk 19:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at St. Matthew Island. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hitro talk 19:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Petrb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Kamloops Blazers, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 16:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Rakowiec, Siedlce County has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rakowiec, Siedlce County was changed by Attractiveafrican69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884501 on 2014-01-28T15:47:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:47, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ruera River. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Epicgenius (talk) 15:58, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Aspartic acid has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Aspartic acid was changed by Attractiveafrican69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964794 on 2014-01-30T16:32:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:33, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing[edit]

If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. --Frze ^{> talk} 17:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]