This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Wikipedia is not a social network
I have been noticing that you have spent most of your time awarding Barnstars to other users on their talk pages and/or editing your userpage. Wikipedia is not a social network or a webhost, and excessive awarding of barnstars cheapen their value. Please consider doing some work in the article space; excessive edits to user talk pages or your own user page is often frowned upon. You can see the task center for ideas on what you can work on to improve the encyclopedia. If you need help, please feel free to ask me anytime. Best, #prodraxisconnect 15:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
After I have warned you, I have seen you award a barnstar to an editor for solely making a single minor category edit [1] on a certain article at [2]. Please stop this; excessive awarding of barnstars cheapen their value as I stated above, and this can be seen as being disruptive and trying to use Wikipedia as a social network or forum. Barnstars should only be awarded for substantial contributions (say, writing an especially well written article, expanding a vital article to WP:GA or WP:FA, expanding a coverage of a certain topic greatly, extensive maintenance/backlog clearing work etc.) not single edits. #prodraxisconnect 20:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
Not enough independent, significant coverage listed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Until This Shakes Apart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Babysharkboss2 was here!! 02:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
How to get green text for quotes
Your post at AN/I mentioned you didn't know how to do this. Use {{tq}}, which is a redirect to {{Talk quote inline}}. Of course, you can use 'Talk quote inline' if you like, but tq's easy to remember (stands for talk quote) and quicker to type. Quotes will come out looking like this. Happy editing, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 17:16, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Babysharkboss2. I've noticed you making a lot of comments at WP:AN/I that simply restate another editor's previous comment, signal your agreement without adding anything, or "state the obvious". AN/I is a tense noticeboard, and a very unpleasant place for most editors to be taken to. Every comment that is added that doesn't work toward resolving the conflict will tend to raise tensions, or at a minimum to waste the time of everyone who reads it. I see that you are a fairly new editor, and it's great to see enthusiasm by our newer editors toward user conduct matters! But people come to AN/I because they are expecting to have their concerns addressed by admins and other very experienced users, and when other editors spend too much time there, they often wind up regretting it. I'd encourage you to focus more on gaining experience in lower-stakes areas of the project—particularly content creation and talkpage discussion—before spending so much time at AN/I. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|she) 18:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
alright, thanks. I just wanted to help, but didn't really know what to say that would be helpful on the ANI. Thank you again, and I think i'll just kinda monitor it.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
