User talk:Belfastshane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

the article was being edited and amended - somehow it got saved, ringing off all the alarms? Belfastshane (talk) 08:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Belfastshane, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kinghan Church, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 11:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kinghan Church - copyright problems[edit]

Sorry, but copyright issues can give Wikipedia serious legal problems. We cannot accept copyright text, even temporarily while you edit it, unless a proper copyright release has been made as described at Wikipedia:Copyrights#Contributors' rights and obligations.

Moreover, just modifying the copied text is unlikely to be enough to avoid copyright violation - please read Wikipedia:Copy-paste. You can use other web-sites as a source of facts, but not as a source of sentences: you must say it in your own words.

There is good advice on how to write an acceptable article at Wikipedia:Your first article, and other helpful links in the Welcome paragraph above. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide some evidence that this is a language independent from YSL? — kwami (talk) 10:21, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is research on that language and it is recognised as such by the Government of Kosovo. --Belfastshane (talk) 11:59, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't answer the question. — kwami (talk) 14:10, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deaf Talkabout requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LivitEh?/What? 01:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian Sign language[edit]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St John's Catholic School for the Deaf, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Handsworth and Daughters of Charity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Surdophobia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surdophobia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surdophobia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mathglot (talk) 06:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


User:Belfastshane/Sign bilingualism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Belfastshane/Sign bilingualism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Belfastshane/Sign bilingualism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SKay (talk) 09:05, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maternal Reflective Method (February 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 18:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maternal Reflective Method (February 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Belfastshane! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Maternal Reflective Method, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:31, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Belfastshane. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maternal Reflective Method".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 09:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]