User talk:Bigles

Marksixe for towns and villages:

Dot size for cities & towns (that are not provincial capitals) is based on the 2004 census (last available census):

• Under 5,000 is size 6
• 5000 to 19,999 is size 8
• 20,000 to 49,999 is size 10
• 50,000 to 99,999 is size 12
• Above 100,000 is size 14

Sûriyeya (talk) 11:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Rules of edit

Rule #2- Copying from maps is strictly prohibited.

You need self-revert you edithere because according to rules of edit we can't use all maps as a sources for edit. And secondly source which you use pro-opp. source but we use pro-opp. sources for succes of rebels. Sûriyeya (talk) 17:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

We all must follow to rules of edit and not violated them. We can't ignored one of main rules which is clear said that we can't use maps as a source for edit.Sûriyeya (talk) 17:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

No problem thats the rules. I will revert my edit Immediately. Bigles (talk) 17:45, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

But not need just ignored data from map! Because on based a data from this map we can seaching other data from crediable sources which can confirm which the villages rebels retake from ISIS. Sûriyeya (talk) 17:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

And other opp. source yesterday said that the rebels offensive to take Ayn Dhakar was reppelled by ISIS(LSY). Clashes also reported near Shajarah and Nafiah.here Sûriyeya (talk) 17:53, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes you are right ISIS really repelled the assault. Oppostion sources also confirm it: https://twitter.com/Serif_Imamagic0/status/722842776757362688 But whats with Saida Al-Golan? Most of the sources say the village is controlled by Nusra? --Bigles (talk) 18:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Which sources? Maybe some of them we can use! Sûriyeya (talk) 18:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Reliable source SOHR said that LSY(ISIS) retake all the points who lost in the last few days.here Sûriyeya (talk) 07:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Green mark update at Yemeni Civil War map

Hello Bigles,

thank you for adding these better visible green marks to the Template. I actually wanted to include these marks in the .svg-map, too, but when I download the mark, the darkgreen border disappears. Any ideas what goes wrong?--Ermanarich (talk) 18:53, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello Ermanarich,
i also tried to download the marks and i don't got these problems. Sorry can't help you in this issue.--Bigles (talk) 19:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Hm... Well, that's strange.

When I download it as .svg version, the darkgreen border dissappears, but in .png it remains. Thanks anyway.--Ermanarich (talk) 19:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Aleppo

We can not use rebels sources for rebels gains, like you used for Jarez and Yahmul! and where source for Aykadah?--Լրագրող (talk) 21:29, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Syrian Gov. source also confirmed it: https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/syrian-rebels-recapture-two-villages-isis-northern-aleppo/ Bigles (talk) 19:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC) Aykadah was never captured by ISIS terrorists according to many pro Gov. map-makers.

Mabrouk Oil Field Lybia

original source for mabrouk oil field in lybia, which you revert to government control, say Daish present in oil field. This mean contested icon is best mark we can use. Original Source is here http://fezzanlibya.com/staff-evacuated-from-oil-fields-in-fear-of-is/?lang=en Twitter source not mean anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.58.63 (talk) 01:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Al Ball

The source you provided doesn't claim that Rebels captured this village so i need you to revert yourself and please don't misinterpret sources anymore.Lists129 (talk) 12:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

A little request

Hello. As you may noticed, the entire Syriacivilwar map is using a new lime color, which you made. Can you consider changing the color a little bit ? As you can read here, I would like the borders on the circle to remain but could you change back the color as it was, as you can see here, it's a different tone than the original red color, which was the same as for the previous lime version, pure green instead of the current darker version. DuckZz (talk) 23:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bigles. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bigles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)