User talk:Bob N1C2

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bob N1C2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 15:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

July 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Loose Women presenters, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 10:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not add content that does not pass the Wikipedia guidelines. I previously explained this to you as an ip user for Good Morning Britain. Thank You -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 14:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 14:52, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Please listen to the Wikipedia based policy guidelines I am giving you. Please stop reverting on Good Morning Britain presenters and reporters, I told you about MOS:TV, Garaway has not officially promoted to main presenters. Even though it may seem like she is. ITV have not officially promoted her. If it be the case she is promoted she will then be added to the bottom of the list not in the middle as the others became main before her. You can read all about this and more about how Television articles should be in general at MOS:TV. If you continue to revert you may be blocked from editing, without further warning.
Thank You -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 14:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the table on List of Loose Women Presenters and here is a source for Garraway as a main presenter, there is also one for Singh http://www.itv.com/goodmorningbritain/meet-the-team/about-kate-garraway Bob N1C2 "'" 17.35, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

I previously explained the Loose Women table as it is unencyclopedic and Tv Guide material. See WP:FANCRUFT, WP:IINFO and WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Garaway is a recurring presenter of GMB and not a main. To be honest I am really sick of this argument. She has a profile as she is recurring, it does not say anything about her being main in the source. She was never promoted from recurring to main. Thank you -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 16:58, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was under the impression that she had replaced Reid, as she has not appeared for two weeks now, and that Garraway has presented three weeks non stop, the loose women table has been there for up to a year, so is thisWP:IINFO new. Bob N1C2 - 18.05

Susanna Reid is on holidays at the moment that is why Garaway is on it more often. My best guess about the LW table would be nobody realised or knew it was against the WP. No the FANCRUFT and IINFO are not new. -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 18:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently it's Emmerdale week on Good Morning Britain next week and Kevin Hughes is apparently on rota as Guest Entertainment Editor and Laura Tobin will supposedly present the weather from there, should this be mentioned on the list of good morning Britain presenters page? Also should Kevin Hughes be added to guest GMB presenters/correspondents list as he has appeared numerous times and Paul Brand is still appearing aswell - Bob N1C2 - 20.58 29/07/2015 (UTC)

August 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 08:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, but i had found an article about Sean Fletcher getting his own Game Show and that also said he would discontinue as sports editor for Good Moning Britain - Garraway seems to have disappeared also. Was there any point in getting rid of that table on Loose Women page which showed what seats they sit/sat in, if there's no rule about that i will place it back. 12.04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Loose Women table please read WP:FANCRUFT, WP:NOTTVGUIDE & WP:IINFO. -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 11:17, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John GormleyJG : Yes but that not TV GUIDE, it's interesting, do you edit that page regularly? As some other users who edit that page regularly may not know that. Bob N1C2 "'"12.19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

ITV News at Ten[edit]

Hello, I'm LBM. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to ITV News at Ten because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. LBM ^{talk to me} 18:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ITV News at Ten. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LBM ^{talk to me} 17:46, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi it's Bob N1C2 here, can i put the presenter history in the news at ten page, User talk:Bob N1C220.25, 26 October 2015

October 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia you may without further warning. I appreciate your contributions towards Wikipedia. But the contributions are completely against Wikipedia's guidelines. Please read WP:IINFO and WP:FANCRUFT if you have not already. This is about the 4th time I had to warn you about your disruptive and non-encyclopedic editing. You may be blocked without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 18:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but you are the one who is disrupting Wikipedia by constantly deleting interesting things, if someone puts that back and you get rid of it I will put it back (User talk:Bob N1C2) 20:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good Morning Britain (2014 TV programme) edits[edit]

Bob, I would suggest you start a discussion on the GMB Talk Page to sort this problem out. It is obvious that you want the table, but other Wikipedians and policies of Wikipedia don't. This would be a great way to avoid any WP:EDITWARS, which you've been warned about several times already. You should also take in consideration of WP:BRD, which is: When you are Bold and your edit gets Reverted, Discuss the problem. Also, please see MOS:HEADINGS for the section headers. Unless the word is a proper noun, only the first word should be capitalized in the section header. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan 22:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Loose Women Episodes[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you made the addition to List of Loose Women episodes, of season 14. Im not sure if you made a mistake as I do notwatch the show so I do not obtain the episodes to work off on. But I noticed you have the date for the episodes as 2015. Where as the show seems to be on season 20 now. Could you try fix wherever is wrong. Thank you. -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 15:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions, but your data is all wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zanzi2015 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC) P.S. Please feel free to add previous seasons to the article as Wikipedia allows it there.[reply]

Sorry but it's not its from a site called TV Guide UK TV Listings, whilst series 1 & 2 are from another site called TV.com, then series 14 is from youtube, then series 19&20 are weekly edited.

Can BobN1C2 please stop making these fantasy line ups for Loose Women. Surely he realises they are going to be removed straight away. Ridiculous and unfunny. CalMetcalfe (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GMB[edit]

Hey I just created a survey I make for ITV for what viewers want of GMB in 2016. It will be up for the month of November and I will give it to ITV in December and hope they will use it. Here it is: http://esurv.org/online-survey.php?surveyID=LMEDJN_2990b147 If you want you can fill it out the more responses we get the better. You can check my Twitter or updates @JohnGormleyJG. Thank you for watching GMB! =) -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 18:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I gave my opinion, can I ask do you think they need to make the show focused on news, my opinion is to have Ben Shephard & Charlotte Hawkins as main presenters, Kate Garraway would present on Wednesdays (in place of Shephard) & Friday (in place of Hawkins), Sean Fletcher would present sport and act as relief presenter, Laura Tobin would still present weather, Ranvir Singh would become features editor and act as relief presenter, John Stapleton would be special correspondent, he also would be a rotated newsreader with Ranvir Singh, Richard Gaisford and Louisa James. And maybe bring back daybreak (2012) theme (User talk:Bob N1C2)20:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you for your for answering the survey. All responses will be given to ITV. -- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 22:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The View Presenters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The View. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The View Episodes[edit]

The article The View Episodes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopedic, unreferenced fancruft.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 17:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The View Episodes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The View Episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The View Episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 17:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The View episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The View. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Shires[edit]

Hello, Bob N1C2. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, John Shires, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want John Shires to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Celosiakitty (talk) 18:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 00:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gaynor Barnes

added links pointing to Newsreader, Bulletins, Replaced and Good Morning Britain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BBC Breakfast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Maguire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited This Morning Summer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phil Vickery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of This Morning presenters and reporters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ITV News at Ten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page News at ten. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited This Morning (TV programme), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Martin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ITV Lunchtime News, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Austin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Bob N1C2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BBC Breakfast[edit]

Bob, please see article's talk page before re-adding the "episode guide". This is AGAINST Wikipedia policy, specifically WP:NOTTVGUIDE. If you continue to re-add it, I will report you to an administrator for edit warring and request a page protection. I've already warned you above. Thanks, Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 04:07, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry it has take a long time for me to receive this, as I only do occasional editing and I am not up to date with all the rules of Wikipedia these days, so I will now be keeping track of the episode guide until further notice. User talk:Bob N1C2 20.43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017[edit]

Your recent editing history at BBC Breakfast shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN ^{talk to me} 07:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:BBC Breakfast. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 08:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at United States, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. {MordeKyle} ☢ 22:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 22:05, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

I really don't know what you're up to, but considering the number of warnings you've previously received, you'll need to present a truly convincing unblock request. Favonian (talk) 22:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]