User talk:Bollywoodbabe

Deepika Padukone[edit]

Fansites are not allowed to be included in the external links section only. You can see all other Bollywood actors' pages. The fansite is used as a reference to prove that the info on the actor is accurate. We are unable to find reliable sites as of now that is why we are currently using it as a reference only. Reference/Extenal links are totally different things. When you removed number 1, you removed all the references. Regards --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 15:46, 19 December 2007

I removed the fansite from the article and added the site that you mentioned. I have used the site you told me as references in her article. Hope everything is fine now. Regards --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 06:47, 20 December 2007

As per, Bollywood Dreamz has mentioned, I request you to kindly stop from removing the links from Deepika Padukone's page. Thank You. Much Appreciated. Universal Hero (talk) 12:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SOMEONE KEEPS TAKING OFF THE .com AND REPLACING IT WITH THE .NET...isn't there room for BOTH????

BollywoodBabe

Image source problem with Image:Anamika 01.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Anamika 01.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree (talk) 11:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Shaurya party 04.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Shaurya party 04.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree (talk) 11:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:282.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:282.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree (talk) 11:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

Please do not remove Copyright Problem tags or other essential maintenance tags from article, as you did here. It is important that copyright concerns be taken seriously and investigated, both for the protection of Wikipedia and for copyright holders. In this case, the article contained information copied directly from IMDb, which has now been removed. If you wish to restore information, please rewrite it in your own words. We can use external sources for ideas, but not for sentences. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:33, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your assertion of authorship[edit]

Hello. I see from your most recent addition to this article that you may have authored the IMDb profile. I'm dropping you a line to let you know that permission to re-use this material must come through official channels. This is essential, because Wikipedia does not require verification of identity on account creation, and obviously we have no other way of knowing that you have authority to release the information to GFDL. For the legal protection of Wikipedia as well as copyright holders, we must verify that before admitting re-use on the encyclopedia. As a first step, if you are asserting authorship, you should note the same on the article's talk page. Following this, you have the following options with regards to incorporating language from this source:

If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to <permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the talk page of the article.
If a note is added to the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License or that it is released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page of the article with a link to where we can find that note.

See Wikipedia:Copyright problems#Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia for more. IMDb prominently reserves copyright of material on its site to itself and its contributors. Unless we can verify that you are the contributor in question, our allowance of the material is in violation of copyright.

Please also note, given the name of the contributor listed at IMDb, that your inclusion of this material and contribution to that article would seem problematic with regards to the conflict of interest policy, which strongly advises that you do not contribute to articles about yourself except in specific, limited circumstances.

I am, for the moment, blanking the material again for copyright concerns. If you wish to return the material, please follow one of the steps above at the same time and place a note on the article's talk page indicating that you have done so. As copyrights are a matter of grave concern, the material can't be included without satisfaction of these requirements.

For the purpose of clarity, I will duplicate this message at the article talk page. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this have to be so complicated? I am the author of the thing...jeeeez. I feel so targeted by you....

I am going to go to IMDB and have them add...released into the public domain will that satisfy you? Is that what you want? Your post is very complicated.

Gilda Pianelli

It's the copyright law of the United States, I'm afraid. As Wikipedia has its servers in the United States, we must follow US copyright law. We cannot include material from another source unless we are legally authorized to do so. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daiana R. Bazzano (May 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft needs independent reliable sources to establish her notability.

Also, remove external links in the article body. They are not permitted.

Focus more on her career and less on personal materials, such as her languages and dogs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daiana R. Bazzano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bollywoodbabe, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daiana R. Bazzano[edit]

Hello, Bollywoodbabe. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Daiana R. Bazzano".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Image = 282.jpg[edit]

The file File:Image = 282.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long-unused personal image with no encyclopedic purpose.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Gilda Pianelli headshot.jpg[edit]

The file File:Gilda Pianelli headshot.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Gilda Pianelli. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Loriann Fontaine and Gilda Pianelli.jpg[edit]

The file File:Loriann Fontaine and Gilda Pianelli.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Gilda Pianelli. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]