User talk:Bonybaby1979

• Welcome!

Hello, Bonybaby1979, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 02:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

COI

Hello, Bonybaby1979. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
• instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Last but not least: All contributors must not contribute content that violates conflict of interest laws (just as all contributors must respect copyright). The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive is valid throughout the European Union. In a German court decision in 2012 (that also relied on the directive) regarding Wikipedia: "The court held that when a company edits a Wikipedia article, the resulting text falsely creates the impression that the edit has no business-related purpose. By implication, the judges found that the average reader of Wikipedia articles expects to find objective and neutral information." That is a very very important condition, comparable to the FTC Guide" that consumers are likely to believe reflects the opinions, beliefs, findings, or experience of a party other than the sponsoring advertiser”. This expectation by consumers of neutral information on Wikipedia, requires that companies not write "their" WP articles for PR/marketing purposes.

Editors who are compensated for their contributions should make the disclosure by placing the {{connected contributor (paid)}} template at the top of the talk page of affected articles and filling in the parameters. They should also supply this information as part of a list on their user page of all their paid contributions.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. LeadSongDog come howl! 18:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Admin,

I have done addition to this article based on my research on the Sanatan Sanstha. A Wikipedia article expects to find objective and neutral information. So I found that information was one sided hence did some changes based of shared references. However, I find it surprising that you have removed details shared with giving reference to Dr Ranjit Patil, minister of state for home. Who says there is no evidence against Sanatan. You kpet remarks of goa MLA who says sanatan is involved in killing but removed reference of Goa chief minister Laxmikant Parsekar, who says Sanatan cannot be banned. You have kept information stating sanatan is involved in Kalburgi’s killing but removed reference of Karantaka CID which don’t even taken name of sanatan in their investigation Don't See Gaikwad Link in Kalburgi Case You also removed the reference where 6-7 local organizations are supporting Sanatan but kept reference of one group which is opposing Sanatan.

Could you guide with the logic behind all this ? how this helps in sharing the neutral information about any topic. In this case Sanatan Sanstha ?

Bonybaby1979 (talk) 07:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

First, I am not an admin, just an editor who's been around for a while. Second, you have not replied on the primary point: are you connected to Sanatan or not? Third, there is a presumption that those who edit the English-language Wikipedia will do so in competent English. As it is very apparently not your first language, please make use of a spelling and grammar checking program so that others may understand what you write. If you prefer, you could get someone to check your prose on a talkpage before adding it to an article. Fourth, Wikipedia is not a news site, nor is it based on primary sources. Discussion of legal proceedings is always difficult to do well here, and it often becomes contentious. When the subject of the proceedings involves terrorism, xenophobia, or religious intolerance the contentious nature is almost certain. To avoid or minimize that, we try to have articles on such subjects based upon published independent analysis, not on the statements by the parties, either prosecution or defense. LeadSongDog come howl! 20:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi LeadSongDog,

Please find my response. Point no. 2 : I am not connected to or Paid by Sanatan Sanstha. I started following news related to this organasation after reading in news paper about it as a spiritual work. and Since then I am following various news about this organisation in news paper and on TV. Point no. 3. Thanks for the advice. I will follow it. Point no. 4 : Agree, However, in the case of claims of terrorism and killings who is more reliable ? Police, Home department or any other sections in society ? What I find here is that you have ignored the references of Police, Home department who are authority in taking actions against terrorism and killings. Instead edited content by giving references of other sections in society. Bonybaby1979 (talk) 13:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)