User talk:Boschanot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


September 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Payyanur has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Payyanur was changed by Boschanot (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951456 on 2020-09-18T02:21:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taliparamba taluk has been accepted[edit]

Taliparamba taluk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

• Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Taliparamba taluk, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 12:46, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Payyanur Taluk has been accepted[edit]

Payyanur Taluk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Padavalam  ►  07:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iritty taluk has been accepted[edit]

Iritty taluk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

• Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Therthally (September 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noahfgodard (talk) 22:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Boschanot! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noahfgodard (talk) 22:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Therthally (September 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A notable topic but none of these sources are suitable, please see WP:REFB for help.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karuvanchal (January 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AviationFreak was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Phrases like "beautiful," "majestic," and "alluring" should be included in articles only when quoting a person or a source directly.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AviationFreak💬 06:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perumpadavu has been accepted[edit]

Perumpadavu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 09:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karuvanchal (February 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Karuvanchal instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kasaragod taluk, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bela and Kolathur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Therthally[edit]

Information icon Hello, Boschanot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Therthally, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Palakkad district[edit]

Hi Thanks for your edit to this page, but I've reverted it as it appears to be an error as you've blanked out some information that was referenced and that I can't see an issue with. If it was done intentionally, please redo it with an edit summary or a comment on the talk page.
Cheers AntiVan (talk) 03:53, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malayalam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nasrani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mysorean invasion of Malabar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Badiyadka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mulleria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kannur. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
Please do not add false templates to pages - Arjayay (talk) 16:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's done to protect vandalism from anonymous users. Can you provide private protection for the page from vandalism by anonymous users? 

Boschanot (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It does nothing whatsoever, except vandalize the page - Arjayay (talk) 17:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Joida, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:50, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a citation to the pie chart which is accessible. Just click on Karnataka in that which will lead to languages spoken in taluks of Karnataka state. In that, you can see Supa there. Supa also known as Joida. I've attached references to that too. Boschanot (talk) 05:45, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boschanot, the source for the pie chart looks fine, thank you for adding them. The references provided for the lede, however, are not valid, nor do I believe that they are actually necessary. [1] Why is "IndiaStudyChannel.com" being added as a reference here at all, and what is the actual link at deccanherald? If there is not an actual link to follow, these references should be removed as they currently provide no value. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:25, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Boschanot, would you please explain what is the purpose of this edit? [2] The concern is similar to that at the Joida page, where invalid external links are being cited as references, but do not provide any information. Please review the Wikipedia:Citing sources content guidelines or the simplified version at Help:Referencing for beginners. It is not helpful to make a vague reference to a domain name/website, as it does not provide any means of verification. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:32, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kasaragod and Kannur district falls under north malabar region. This is a cultural entity. I've attached citations for that which is accessible. If you want more, I can add more Boschanot (talk) 00:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Boschanot, please respond to the questions asked here. With this edit [3] what was your intent on including a link to "IndiaStudyChannel.com" as an empty reference? Likewise with this edit [4] what is the purpose of adding an invalid external link? These links are insufficient as sources, as they are vague references to a domain name or website, and fail to provide any means of verification. Please review Wikipedia:Citing sources guidelines, and note that there are resources available for help at Wikipedia:Teahouse. You may also consider discussing your proposed changes on the respective article talk page. Persistent and continued addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content in this manner is disruptive, if you have any other poorly sourced changes elsewhere please self-revert or remediate them as soon as possible. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kannur district, you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent addition of poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Language of cited references[edit]

Naturally, for an English language encyclopaedia citations to references in English are preferable where possible, but they aren't "mandatory", as a citation in another language is better than no citation, and the fact that a cited source isn't in English doesn't invalidate it. By all means add reliable English citations where there aren't any, if you can, but please don't remove references just because they aren't in English. JBW (talk) 10:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing without using an account, and edit-warring[edit]

  1. Editing sometimes using your account and sometimes without logging in is not a good idea, as it is likely to mislead other editors into thinking that different people are involved. It also runs the risk of giving the impression that you are dishonestly trying to give the impression that two different editors are involved, even if in fact you don't intend to give that impression. Editing the same page both with and without using your account is something which you must not do, as the risk of misleading is too great.
  2. If you find you are in disagreement with other editors, you may like to explain your reasons, and be willing to discuss the issues involved, with a view to trying to reach agreement. However, repeatedly restoring your preferred version of page content, presumably in the hope that if you carry on long enough other editors will give up and you will get your way, is not acceptable. If we were to allow that, the result would be that the most stubborn editor would always get their way,which would obviously not be helpful. Editors who persist in reverting to their preferred version may be blocked from editing. A more detailed account is available in the policy on edit-warring. JBW (talk) 10:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hosabettu, Kasaragod[edit]

Hello, Boschanot,

Thank you for creating Hosabettu, Kasaragod.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

These references are vague and not precise. Consider using Geonames as a source. Add precise references that mention this village in Kerala.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 12:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kannur taluk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Munderi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Boschanot

Thank you for creating Kunnothuparamba.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please use a more accurate url in the ref. the url should take a person directly to the pdf, you can also get the right village using https://censusindia.gov.in/pca/Searchdata.aspx and use that url

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Leschnei. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kanjikuzhy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Leschnei (talk) 11:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kanjikuzhi is disambiguos link which is a place in 3 districts of Kerala. So to avoid the confusion, I've moved it to redirect disambiguos link Boschanot (talk) 11:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree there needs to be a DAB page, that was just not the correct way to do it! I have created a DAB page at Kanjikuzhi (disambiguation) including Kanjikuzhi, Kanjikkuzhi, Kanjikuzhi (Alappuzha), and Kanjikuzhy. Leschnei (talk) 11:37, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruption.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Boschanot, please note that Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, and as such communication is required. Persistent disruptive editing by way of removing sourced content without explanation, the addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content and continuous edit warring across multiple topics are not welcome. Editors are expected to make a good faith effort to respond and discuss concerns as they arise, which is not happening here. Any and all changes to Wikipedia articles are required to be attributed to reliable sources, as you have been notified. Please address the concerns posted thus far on your talk page at your own convenience. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Boschanot&oldid=1068127411"