User talk:Brentwhite111

Welcome!

Hello, Brentwhite111, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jytdog (talk) 22:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of interest in Wikipedia

Hi Brentwhite111. I spend time working on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing, which is mostly about health and medicine. I am not an administrator.

It is fairly clear that you are picking up where Chicago Booth Marketing Department left off.

Lots of people come to Wikipedia with some sort of conflict of interest and are not aware of how the editing community defines and manages conflict of interest. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Hello, Brentwhite111. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Comments and requests

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. Unmanaged conflicts of interest can also lead to people behaving in ways that violate our behavioral policies and cause disruption in the normal editing process. Managing conflict of interest well, also protects conflicted editors themselves - please see WP:Wikipedia is in the real world, and Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia for some guidance and stories about people who have brought bad press upon themselves through unmanaged conflict of interest editing.

As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. Here in Wikipedia such disclosures must be made explicitly. Would you please disclose any connection you have with University of Chicago? After you respond (and you can just reply below), I can walk you through the formal disclosure process, as well as how the "peer review" part happens and then, if you like, I can provide you with some more general orientation as to how this place works. Please reply here, just below, to keep the discussion in one place.

But please stop editing the article about the business school until you are oriented. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 22:11, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Hey there, @Jytdog: I work for the University of Chicago Booth School of Business in the Marketing Department. I've been asked to correct some of the things that are incorrect on Wikipedia page for the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. What's the next step I/we need to take so that I can edit the page? Happy to do whatever is needed, and I appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brentwhite111 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for replying! Quick note on the logistics of discussing things on Talk pages, which are essential for everything that happens here. In Talk page discussions, we "thread" comments by indenting (see WP:THREAD) - when you reply to someone, you put a colon in front of your comment, which the Wikipedia software will render into an indent when you save your edit; if the other person has indented once, then you indent twice by putting two colons in front of your comment, which the WP software converts into two indents, and so on, and when that gets ridiculous you reset back to the margin (or "outdent") by putting this {{od}} in front of your comment. Threading/indenting also allows you to make it clear if you are also responding to something that someone else responded to if there are more than two people in the discussion; in that case you would indent the same amount as the person just above you in the thread. I hope that all makes sense.

And at the end of the comment, please "sign" by typing exactly four (not 3 or 5) tildas "~~~~" which the WP software converts into a date stamp and links to your talk and user pages when you save your edit.

Indenting and signing, are how we know who said what to whom and when.

Please be aware that threading and signing are fundamental etiquette here, as basic as "please" and "thank you", and continually failing to thread and sign communicates rudeness, and eventually people may start to ignore you (see here).

I know this is unwieldy, but this is the software environment we have to work on. Will reply on the substance in a second... Jytdog (talk) 20:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

OK, thanks for disclosing. To finish the disclosure piece, would you please add the disclosure to your user page (which is User:Brentwhite111 - a redlink, because you haven't written anything there yet). Just something simple like: "I work for the University of Chicago Booth School of Business in the Marketing Department and have a conflict of interest with regard to that school and related topics" would be fine. If you want to add anything else there that is relevant to what you want to do in WP feel free to add it, but please don't add anything promotional about the school or yourself (see WP:USERPAGE for guidance if you like).

I added a tag to Talk:University of Chicago Booth School of Business, so the disclosure is done there. Once you disclose on your user page, the disclosure piece of this will be done. Would you please reply here after you do that? Then we can move to the next step (and you can practice indenting and signing :) ) Jytdog (talk) 21:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Howdy. Disclosure added to my user page. I opted to copy and and paste exactly what you recommended. Appreciate all fo your help. And thanks for being patient with my formatting; I'm new to the Wiki community, obviously. Brentwhite111 (talk) 21:44, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for being responsive. I'll open a new section for the "prior review" step... Jytdog (talk) 22:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

2nd step

OK, so As I noted above, there are two pieces to COI management in WP. The first is disclosure. The second is a form of peer review. This piece may seem a bit strange to you at first, but if you think about it, it will make sense. In Wikipedia, editors can immediately publish their work, with no intervening publisher or standard peer review -- you can just create an article, click save, and voilà there is a new article, and you can go into any article, make changes, click save, and done. No intermediary - no publisher, no "editors" as that term is used in the real world. So the bias that conflicted editors tend to have, can go right into the article. Conflicted editors are also really driven to try to make the article fit with their external interest. If they edit directly, this often leads to big battles with other editors.

What we ask of editors who have a COI or who are paid, and want to work on articles where their COI is relevant, is:

a) if you want to create an article relevant to a COI you have, create the article as a draft through the WP:AFC process, disclose your COI on the Talk page with the Template:Connected contributor (paid) tag, and then submit the draft article for review (the AfC process sets up a nice big button for you to click when it is ready) so it can be reviewed before it publishes; and

b) And if you want to change content in any existing article on a topic where you have a COI, we ask you to

(i) disclose at the Talk page of the article with the Template:Connected contributor (paid) tag, putting it at the bottom of the beige box at the top of the page; and

(ii) propose content on the Talk page for others to review and implement before it goes live, instead of doing it directly yourself. Just open a new section on the talk page, put the proposed content there formatted just as you would if you were adding it directly to the article, and just below the header (at the top of the editing window) place the {{request edit}} tag to flag it for other editors to review. In general it should be relatively short so that it is not too much review at once. Sometimes editors propose complete rewrites, providing a link to their sandbox for example. This is OK to do but please be aware that it is lot more for volunteers to process and will probably take longer.

By following those "peer review" processes, editors with a COI can contribute where they have a COI, and the integrity of WP can be protected. We get some great contributions that way, when conflicted editors take the time to understand what kinds of proposals are OK under the content policies.

But understanding the mission, and the policies and guidelines through which we realize the mission, is very important! There are a whole slew of policies and guidelines that govern content and behavior here in Wikipedia. Please see User:Jytdog/How for an overview of what Wikipedia is and is not (we are not a directory or a place to promote anything), and for an overview of the content and behavior policies and guidelines. Learning and following these is very important, and takes time. Please be aware that you have created a Wikipedia account, and this makes you a Wikipedian - you are obligated to pursue Wikipedia's mission first and foremost when you work here, and you are obligated to edit according to the policies and guidelines. Editing Wikipedia is a privilege that is freely offered to all, but the community restricts or completely takes that privilege away from people who will not edit and behave as Wikipedians.

We do especially struggle with pages about schools. Departments like yours are keenly aware of reputation, and there are often alum who want to write about how great their alma mater was, and so pages about schools are often completely hijacked and are just advertising brochures. We have a tag and essay especially for school pages -- see WP:BOOSTER.

I hope that makes sense to you. We are aiming to provide accepted knowledge -- encyclopedia content.

Will you please agree to learn and follow the content and behavioral policies and guidelines, and to follow the peer review processes going forward when you want to work on the Booth article or any article where your COI is relevant? Do let me know, and if anything above doesn't make sense I would be happy to discuss. Best regards Jytdog (talk) 22:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi there. I'm circling back around on this. I'm having a hard time following next steps. Perhaps you can walk me through step by step what to do for one specific change. Then, once I understand the process, I can make further corrections to the Chicago Booth article, following the correct process and mindful of Wikipedia's policies.

That said, here is one change that should be made to the Chicago Booth article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Chicago_Booth_School_of_Business

In the "Research and Learning Centers" section, "Michael P. Polsky Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation" should be changed to "The University of Chicago Polsky Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation."

Step by step, can you walk me through exactly how you would make that update if you were me?

As before, I appreciate your time and help. Brentwhite111 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)