User talk:BrillLyle/Archives/ 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The Signpost: 10 February 2016

16:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the changes!

They are lovely. I was about to get some work done on it this morning and lo and behold! A WikiFairy had come around and made the page so much better already. --DrX (talk) 13:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

@Doctorxgc: Oh good, I hoped that would be welcome! I've never been called a WikiFairy before. I love it! Let me know when you move the page to it's permanent home -- I will update the link to it on the WM NYC Event Archive tab.... Looks like amazing work you and @Mozucat: are doing! Xo - Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 14:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions

Thank you for participating in the

Black Women's History edit-a-thon

  • February 2016
  • More than 170 articles were created
  • Hosted by Women in Red

(... check out our next event)

--Ipigott (talk) 14:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Willie Little

picked this kitten that looks determined and tough. thanks for the editing on Willie Little you did last night, adding the headings, and grant details. I don't know how you stay on top of all of this?!

LisianthusDahlia (talk) 14:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

@LisianthusDahlia: Thanks for the kitten! Love it! Glad to help out -- I think the Willie Little page needs more TLC but that was all I could do semi-quickly.... He has so much stuff on his website (articles, etc.) that he's done most of the work! Glad you're editing -- let me or Heather know if you need any assistance! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 15:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
I got two photos of Willie that he is allowing us to use, not sure how to post them on the page.
will definitely be taking Willie Brown out of stub status.LisianthusDahlia (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Willie Little that is! I need to stop multitasking.....LisianthusDahlia (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
@LisianthusDahlia: Ha! I knew what you meant! Funny.... That's great! Uploading pictures is difficult as you need to either claim ownership or Little can publish the images on his website with the correct Creative Commons license -- allowing the photo to be licensed freely. Recommend looking at the graphic on this page here called "What can I upload to Wikimedia Commons." It is super clear and has been one of the only ways that I understood photos on Wikipedia. -- BrillLyle (talk) 15:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Use one of the following:
The copyright holder published this work with the right Creative Commons license
* Not all Creative Commons licenses are good for this site. Make sure the copyright holder used one of these licenses.
* Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 (legal code)
* Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 (legal code)
* Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 (legal code)
* Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (legal code)
* Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (legal code)
* Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 (legal code)
* Creative Commons CC0 Waiver (release all rights, like public domain: legal code)

Books & Bytes - Issue 15

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 15, December-January 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - Ships, medical resources, plus Arabic and Farsi resources
  • #1lib1ref campaign summary and highlights
  • New branches and coordinators

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

A cookie for you!

Got to send you at least one cookie, after all the batches you've been delivering!

Thanks so much for sending welcome messages to all our new Wikipedia editors for the Ithaca Art + Feminism edit-a-thon project. They feel well organized and are gearing up for action. Merci beaucoup!

Unionpearl (talk) 01:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
@Unionpearl: Thanks so much for the cookie! Very excited about the upcoming editathons! Let me know if you need anything! Best to you -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 16:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

18:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 February 2016


2016 Art And Feminism Wikipedia Editathon @ CCA

You are invited! - Saturday, March 5 - Wikipedia:Meetup/San Francisco/ArtandFeminism 2016
Arts+Feminism logo
Please join us at the California College of the Arts' Simpson Library on Saturday March 5, 2016,
for an event aimed at collaboratively expanding Wikipedia articles covering Art and Feminism, and the biographies of women artists!

--Circa73 (talk)

Disambiguation help?

Hi there I'm wondering if you can tell me anything about what exactly the "Disambiguation link notification" message means on my talk page? I can't find the connection to edits I've made. :/ Thanks!--Heathart (talk) 19:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Also when you have a moment, do you know why everyone else who logs in (who I'm training) to my computer and browser has the choice to "edit source" or "edit" and my log in just allows me to "edit"(which is souce code only)? --Heathart (talk) 23:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
@Heathart: Yeah, it's in your Preferences, Editing tab, "Temporarily disable the visual editor while it is in beta." I don't use the editor, I use the code one because I am more comfortable with that one and you become a better editor that way -- so unless someone is really bad on the computer I recommend using the regular (not visual editor) option. But do what your comfort level is. Chumps like me will clean up all the potential formatting issues from the visual editor I guess so it doesn't matter at the end of the day. Also recommend syntax highlighting under Gadgets tab, Editing section in your Preferences. It's amazing! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk)

Signing messages

Hello, I've noticed that you have signed your messages on the administrators' noticeboard with three tildes, so they just show your username. Please sign them with four tildes ("~~~~") instead, so they show a timestamp. This is helpful for both humans and computers alike to make it easier to determine when a message was sent, and is also required for pings to work. Graham87 14:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@Graham87: Apologies, someone just told me about the three tilde thing so I thought it was okay to use. Got it now. Thanks for letting me know. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 18:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

You are always so amazingly helpful. thanks! Heathart (talk) 23:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

A+F participants

Hi BL, I would think that there should be a better way to add participants than putting the section (out of order) at the bottom of the page... Was there a reason why you rearranged these? There are other editors who can help with templates to do what you want (especially if you plan to use it across dozens of pages) czar 22:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Czar It was decided by Michael at A+F Theredproject to okay this implementation -- WHICH HAS BEEN DONE across all the satellite event pages. It is obviously not perfect but seemed to be a functional improvement cf. the prior method. The button works well except for the bug it has that the participants generating at the bottom of the page. So I'm not sure what Michael communicated to the organizers at each event but if people can leave the participants list at the bottom that would really help. This was created by Pharos FYI.
The only suggestion I would make is to put the Registration section directly above Participants in the footer. This might've been a more logical location but I am exhausted from updating the over 120+ event pages so the thought of "fixing" this is not something I can face right now. So yeah I understand your concerns but if you could bear with it's much appreciated.... -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 22:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Yes, {{meetupsig}} works and is particularly useful in preventing editconflicts for large in-person editathons, but because of technical limitations it is only able to add names to the very bottom section.--Pharos (talk) 22:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi all. The A+F team hasn't had the bandwidth to communicate this to organizers yet. We are planning a few last communications over the next week. TX. --Theredproject (talk) 22:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
If I have time and am on the page anyway I'm going to move Registration to the bottom. Mozucat just had a VERY successful event where she used that format and it was very brill... See OEB Sign Up -- BrillLyle (talk) 22:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Pharos -- Thoughts? -- BrillLyle (talk) 04:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Czar, this looks positive, and I'm going to research with you on ways to check logged-in status.--Pharos (talk) 04:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

20:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for your help during the Art + Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at Oxford College Library of Emory University!

Vrclibrarian (talk) 23:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Looking forward to this weekend!

Hi User:BrillLyle. Thanks for the warm welcome. I'll see you at A+F on Saturday! Sev2109 (talk) 03:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Sev2109: You're welcome! Let me know if you have any questions.... Definitely say hi if it's not too crazy. Can't wait! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 17:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for the warm welcome and guidance! Looking forward to making more and more contributions. :)

Stephliana (talk) 21:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Saturday March 5, 10am-5pm: Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon @ MoMA

You are invited to join us for the MoMA Art+Feminism edit-a-thon on Saturday, to support the expansion of Wikipedia's coverage of women in the arts.

We encourage both people new to Wikipedia, and people who have experience editing online, or have joined us for past edit-a-thon events.

This is by far our biggest event of the year (over 200 participants in the last edition), and every extra hand counts, so please join and volunteer to help us engage new communities!

10:00am - 5:00pm (drop-in anytime!) at The Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building at the Museum of Modern Art, 4 West 54 Street - between 5th/6th, New York, NY 10019
Please note that this entrance is one block north of the main 53rd Street entrance, closer to 5th Avenue.

And bring your interested friends and colleagues!

For those outside of the city, or unable to join on Saturday, check out Art+Feminism regional and global events as well. --Pharos (talk) 21:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Auto-signup on A+F meetup page

Hi there--thanks so much for adding the quick & easy signup button to the Ithaca Art + Feminism meetup page! For some reason, it's adding new users with a bullet point, rather than in numerical order. I'm not sure how to fix this other than going into the code afterward. I've added a few more numbers, but they weren't there when we first encountered the problem. Any advice? Sorry to bother you with this request for help! Unionpearl (talk) 01:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Unionpearl - Yes this is a known bug. We don't have a solution at this point -- really sorry for the hassle. I've been going into the pages and changing the bullet to a number and removing the extra space. No fix but if you can bear with -- all of the events are encountering this same issue. Let me know if I can be of any help. Sorry again. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 05:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
I can fix this, but if you're replacing the template on every page anyway, would you want to use {{meetup participant signup}}? czar 05:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Czar Hey I don't think this is something that is fixable -- at least it's not something Pharos was able to fix. If you could hold off doing anything until I check with him that would really help. Unfortunately I don't think your template solves the actual problem with the bullet and space either -- and we'd want to test it in a small beta editathon first I think like we did for the blue button. So if you can hold off until I check with Pharos I'd really appreciate it. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 06:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Plus I'm NOT replacing the template on every page like i've already done 2 times. I am just changing the bullet to a # sign and removing a space. On an as needed basis (some folks are savvy and can do that themselves. I don't want to go through and change to something else at this point until I check with Pharos. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 06:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
You don't have to do anything you don't want to do, but I think it would make more sense to replace a template once than to change every bullet to a pound sign for each sign-in. Anyway, my template works now. If you use {{Template:Meetup participant signup|type=numbered}}, new sign-ups will use the pound symbol when added to the bottom of the page. I have a demo here if you're interested. czar 06:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
I really appreciate you trying to find a solution. Unfortunately this solution doesn't work either, as the numbering doesn't increment. That was the issue Pharos found as well. Beside Pharos this is also A+F's call not mine. I am only helping out. And again I have changed the template now two times on over 100 event pages so my preference is to leave it be and allow A+F to reach out to organizers and let them know this is a known issue and that it might require a slight amount of management. As far as your proposal I am also not a huge fan of two buttons. The idea was to have a one button registration. This was Pharos' idea so maybe he can weigh in here to elucidate. Again really appreciate the effort you've made but again want to hold off for now. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 12:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
BrillLyle : I updated the Ithaca A+F meetup page with the new numbered signup code. Hope that's OK. Unionpearl (talk) 17:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi BrillLyle! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 05:31, Thursday, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you :)) May Hachem93 (talk) 17:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks so much May Hachem93! Please customize the Arabic if you want to. I would like to embrace other languages for this initiative -- and your event -- as fully as possible! I had just copied text from your Facebook event page. Best to you! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! Sure I will maybe now we are a bit busy monitoring the editing process. But sooner or later this will be done. (y) --May Hachem93 (talk) 22:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Very cool! I tried to preserve the Arabic in the URL, tried also (as you can probably tell) to do a wikilink but it wouldn't display. Wonderful work you have done! All the best -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 22:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for warm welcome + a user profile question

Hi BrillLyle, I am going to the MoMA edit-a-thon tomorrow, and in preparation I was trying to figure out some of the editing process and also log in to my old profile, which was on Russian wikipedia (ru.wiki). When I logged into en.wiki it looks like an entirely new account was created. Do you know if accounts are separated by language like that? Or are they? And can I edit en.wiki tomorrow under my old profile? ---Thanks a lot!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by False friend (talkcontribs) 17:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi there False friend. I think that you can have a universal login -- or opt not to. But this is very beyond my skillset. I'd recommend asking the kind folks in the IRC channel for help with this. They are so great over there. They will have a quicker answer than if I dig around and try to figure it out. Let me know if it works, and def say hi tomorrow if you want! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 18:39, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks so much, Erika, I got a superclear explanation at the help channel. Apparently, every user gets a universal profile = a separate profile for every-language-wiki. Any of the profiles only tracks edits made in the specific language wiki, but all the profiles under my username are mine:) Looking forward to the event tomorrow, and hope I see you there! Maria // False friend (talk) 19:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Well that makes sense. I sort of thought that but there's a universal login, right? Glad the IRC folks were helpful. I go over there all the time when I get stuck and need help or clarification on stuff. :-) -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 19:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for welcoming me!

Hi BrillLyle, thanks for the welcome! I'm at an Art + Feminism edit-a-thon at USF today, learning how to edit for the first time. :) Lettersee (talk) 19:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Hiya Lettersee! Welcome! It looks like you have a really cool active event over there. Let me know if you need anything or have any questions! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 19:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Hello! I have a question about adding images to wiki pages. I understand there are copyright laws regarding images, so how would I go about adding a photograph of say Francois Gilot to her wikipedia page?

thanks in advance for your time? Alecia Teaglet (talk) 23:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi there Alecia aka Teaglet! Thanks for the pie!!!
As to your question: If you have a picture of Françoise Gilot that you own, you can upload it to Wikimedia Commons -- the photo and document repository for all of the Wikimedia projects, which includes Wikipedia. If you don't own the picture, or don't have the correct free license for the picture, it can't go up on Wikimedia Commons and/or Wikipedia. I find this graphic here very helpful. Boiled down, if the photo has the correct open Creative Commons license, it can go up on Wikipedia. If it doesn't, it will pretty instantly pulled down. This is why there aren't as many images as would be ideal on Wikipedia. It's not easy. Hope that helps. There's a good Tutorial here. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 23:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Talking to me!

Highlytexturedlibrarian (talk) 02:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC) I'm not sure how to "talk" to you, but I wanted to thank you for the cookies.

Hi Highlytexturedlibrarian -- you just did it -- you wrote to me on my Talk page.
Glad you liked the cookies. Reach out if you need help or have questions.
I see you were at the wonderful Octavia Spencer event at Spelman. You can be very proud of the work that event produced! It was one of the better events I can remember, and I know that the profs were very jazzed. Great job! :-) -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 02:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hiya!

Thanks for your message and the cookies. Looking forward to learn. Esmeralda000 (talk) 02:46, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Esmeralda000 ! Thanks for saying hi on my talk page. Glad you liked the cookies. Please reach out if you have questions, etc.! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 02:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


Thank you!

Thank you very much for the welcome message. I am part of a student group who is setting up a page and I have a question. I would to find a student template for my student project. Do you know where to find it? Sitesofversailles (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Sitesofversailles -- Apologies it was a very busy day today so I am only now seeing your message. Did you get help? -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 04:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the cookies!

Hello BrillLyle, thanks so much for the warm welcome and the cookies! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Picklecat (talkcontribs) 21:33, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

HI Picklecat! Hope you had a good event. Please reach out if you need anything! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 04:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Pattytv

Pattytv (talk) 02:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Thanks for the welcome! I'm slowly learning. Thanks for any help you can offer!!!

Hi Pattytv! Thanks for writing. Let me know if you need anything specifically! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 04:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you re. Art+Feminism

Just wanted to send you a quick thank you for helping set up and maintain all the various Art+Feminism Meetup pages out there, including Columbus'. It's much appreciated! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 06:53, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi User:SuperHamster! Thanks so much for the kind note. Hope you had a great event! Reach out if you need anything! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 13:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Aaaand thank you again! I was about to go through and list contributions myself, when I noticed that someone had already done an excellent job. Curious, did you use any sort of tool to help you compile contributions, or did you go through them by hand? ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 16:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi User:SuperHamster! You're welcome.... Hope I didn't overstep -- not my intention at all. To answer your question: Yes, by hand sadly, checking sign in folks' contributions, then often looking at pages listed as outcomes. It's not ideal but the tools don't seem to be able to capture this basic info with any precision, and for me it's very helpful to see how events have gone I can get a glimpse of the engagement the more spider-web the edits are (if that makes any sense). Though I suspect many events are not using the event page as a locus or hub, so work is probably being done that isn't captured. It's a definite challenge. My hope is that by interacting with the "safe space" of the event page and doing the minimal logging in and recording edits that new editors can get more experience editing, even if it's just that minimal recordkeeping stuff. :-) Thanks for the kind words! Much appreciated. -- Erika (Wikimedia NYC) aka BrillLyle (talk) 18:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
No, you didn't overstep at all! Much appreciated - and you did a more thorough job then I would have :) Keep up the great work! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

another Thank you re. Art+Feminism

Hello from the ICA Boston Art+Feminism meet-up, I'm a first-time trainer and new editor and appreciated your hello and offer to help out! We'll be here until 4pm today. If there is a quick link/any info about signing up new users I'd love to see it- I have been made an account creator, but not sure how to wield this new power! Thanks!! Penellohpee (talk) 15:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Penellohpee. I'd be happy to help remotely. You can reach out to me and keep in touch via g-chat if you want, it's no problem: wp.brilllyle
As far as account creator here is the link, on Wikipedia, type in the search string: Special:Create account. I usually check the box "Use a temporary random password and send it to the specified email address". Doing this you just need the case sensitive user name the new editors want and the email to send the registration link. The new folks can make about 6 new registrations at your IP address before I think it auto-locks you out, so you'll definitely need to do this. I have AC rights as well because we do so many editathons here in NYC so you can send me a list of the new editor info and I can assist if you start to get a large queue.
Don't be shy! It's no problem!
I made this emoticon summary for new users for our Twitter -- it might be helpful? :-) -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
⭐️ Your 1st Edits! ⭐️
👩🏻 Register @Wikipedia
💃 Sign In @ Event Page
🙋 User Page: Sentence on YOU
🗣 Add Content Baby Steps!
Citation 📰 Work 📚


Hi BrillLyle Thank you so much! I'll be in touch through the day, and those emoji are inspirational...here we go! Penellohpee (talk) 16:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Yet ANOTHER Thank you re. Art+Feminism

BrillLyle, Thank you for helping document the work we did on Friday at our meetup. I had started to try to do some of that work, but ran out of time on Friday. Also, if you have any constructive criticism for me about some of the results of our work, do let me know. The feedback would be much appreciated. Thanks again for being such an amazing member of this community! 138.202.1.215 Cmisc (talk) 23:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Cmisc! Glad to help.... Let me know if you have any specific questions or pages. Will do what I can! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 19:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Language question

Hello, a question from a new editor: if you make edits in one language, are they universally accessible via translate, or tied to just one language-version of the page? Can try to rephrase if the question is confusing. Thanks!! Penellohpee (talk) 17:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Penellohpee -- A friendly reminder to always start a new section. I don't want to miss your comment! :-)
I think I understand what you are asking. There is a Content translation tool that is in beta and might be helpful, but the way the different languages work on Wikipedia is each encyclopedia (English Wikipedia, Spanish Wikipedia, French Wikipedia) has it's own article. And there's no automatic translation. Here's the list -- which includes the numbers of pages of content on each Wiki: List of Wikipedias. Now I feel like I'm not answering the question. There's no "magic" button.... -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi BrillLyle Thank you- that gets at the answer and is a good reminder about starting sections! Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penellohpee (talkcontribs) 17:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Penellohpee -- Oh good! More reminders (great, eh? #oy!).... Indent another colon when responding and don't forget the four tildes (~) at the end of your comment to sign and date! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 17:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi User:BrillLyle\BrillLyle learning by doing! The Translation Content Tool is helping, but we keep getting the message "Content issues, repeated attempts to vandalize" and notes the content does not meet Wikipedia English standards. This pops up during editing, before even attempting to post. The editor is removing some words to make the translation make sense and wondered if that caused the flag. Any ideas? Thanks! Penellohpee (talk) 20:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Penellohpee -- Sorry just saw your message. I think probably if this issue comes up, approach the translation the way you would a new entry. Work in the sandbox, make the entry as good as you can, and submit it when it meets good levels of Wikipedia editing. I think this applies whether it's a translation or not. I don't have multiple language skills but my impression of translation work -- and especially these translation tools -- is that it's very difficult to do well unless you have experience doing translations IRL. And as I mentioned when I told you about that tool, it's in beta, so it's not going to be perfect. So I would recommend lowering expectations, unfortunately, that this is an easy/quick thing. I really truly believe this is a huge issue -- which you have met and experienced head on. Sorry I don't have more experience with translation work. Hope you were able to reach edits that you were happy with and that will add to the encyclopedia. -- Best, Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 08:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

WIR A+F

Hoping you enjoyed the recently-held in-person Art+Feminism meetup,
we cordially invite you continue your participation by joining the
virtual worldwide online event
hosted by Women in Red.
March 2016 (Women's History Month)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

20:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

San Diego A+F "saving sweep"

If you're just aiming for a SWAG, it may not matter, but I don't see how the improved/created lists in this edit were arrived at.

The only page created during the three hour Wikipedia:Meetup/San Diego/ArtandFeminism 2016 was Draft:Marjorie Nodelman. Everything else that was worked on:

existed long before the meetup. Although Draft:Anne K. Batten and Draft:Edie McKee Harper were on our like-to-improve list, no one actually did. In the hours before the meetup I made enough of an edit to them to postponed G13 and keep them from being deleted for another 6 months. To call them in any way improved by that would cheapen the meaning of the word. Worldbruce (talk) 07:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

In an effort to capture edits that were made I have been going through the event pages and trusting that the organizers and experienced editors who participated would make sure that if they listed pages as being edited on the event pages that they were indeed edited. If an editor was signed up for the event I checked their User contributions by date stamp and added edits during the time of the editathon. I did not click through and check the edits made. Another team is checking the DRAFTS but mostly for AfD/Speedy deletion to see if there's any salvation of the work. I am relying on both the event organizers and experienced editors who attended the event to see whatever sweep is done and adjust if it is inaccurate. I had hoped that the event organizer for the satellite and the experienced editors would make sure there was an exhaustive list of edits made but very few events did this, which is why I am. This is all being done manually in order to hopefully be as precise as possible. I am a volunteer and receive no compensation for this effort, and am only doing the sweeps in an effort to help support the initiative.
So if there are edits that are not to be counted by all means please make the adjustments. This is not an effort to hoodwink or misrepresent edits somehow. This is an effort to collect information about who attended and who made edits -- something that is typically done as a starting point in gathering event metrics. So please step in and adjust the outcomes of your event. Thanks -- BrillLyle (talk) 12:16, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
OK, thanks, done. Although I've been around Wikipedia for a while, this is the first event I've attended, so I wasn't sure what you were looking for in terms of reporting. Worldbruce (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Worldbruce, so much. 100% serious.
As an experienced editor if you have any suggestions on how to capture the edits, please let me know. I am the Secretary of Wikimedia NYC and we put on over 35 events last year, will probably do at least that number again this year. We are trying to figure out the easiest approach to user metrics but it's not a very automated -- or easy process -- so anything you might have to offer would be much appreciated. Right now it's just a manual slog through on Wiki sign ins and going through articles people post they've worked on. So.... :-) -- Best, BrillLyle (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

newbie says hello

Hello,

Thank you for the cookies!

Greetings Seb aka bibboy16 Bibboy16 (talk) 09:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Bibboy16! Thank you! Let me know if you have any questions on edits! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 16:43, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: February 2016





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wednesday March 16, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants.

We will also follow up on plans for recent (Art+Feminism!) and upcoming edit-a-thons, and other outreach activities.

We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

We will also vote on nominations for the global Wikimedia Foundation board.

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles gallery, 137 West 14th Street

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! (One likely talk this month will be on the Wikidata project.) Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 18:06, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Thank you for the welcome

Hello and thank you for the welcome (and cookies!) - have I written this in the correct place?! Still very new to WP - I joined to talk part in the Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon at Dulwich Picture Gallery. Quizfan77 (talk) 18:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

PS - I notice you have a To-Do list, I would love to create one for myself - how do I go about this? Quizfan77 (talk) 18:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Quizfan77! Yes, excellent work. This is the place to talk to editors, on their talk pages. Well done! Glad you liked the cookies. That always makes me happy, and someone gave them to me, so.... :-)
As far as a To Do List, I created a page in my "namespace" so you would just append "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Quizfan77" to be something like "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Quizfan77/ToDo". Wikipedia is so addictive, my list is MASSIVE at this point. Sort of overwhelming!
Let me know if you have any other questions. And welcome again! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks and a ? about Redirects

Wow varda -- thanks for the yogurt! That was a first...
Which pages are you working with / having problems with? I looked in your contributions and didn't see the redirect, etc.
Let me know, and we can work on it together, or I can fix and we can talk through....
-- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 14:49, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
I'm trying to kill the redirect on Bill Niman's page and convert it into a new article. Right now it redirects to Niman Ranch. Thanks for your help! varda (talk) 14:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Okay, so where is the new page? I would recommend not using Articles for Creation -- draft spaces are much better.... -- BrillLyle (talk) 15:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Oh, I see. So I should draft the page in my Sandbox first, and THEN change the link. I was trying to change the link first to create a stub. But I couldn't figure out how to get past the redirection problem. varda (talk) 15:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)


Yep. Create the stub first -- and ideally have an experienced editor take a gander at it before you add the content to the mainspace. Once the stub is in good shape (stubs are a great approach to a new article BTW!), you'll click on the edit button here: redirect, and paste in your content, replacing the redirect with the stub info. I got to the redirect by putting Niman's name into the search and then looking under the title of the page that came up. There's a link to the redirect there. Do you see it? -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 15:57, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Hmmm can't seem to find the redirect link on my own. Can you screenshot it for me? Thanks Erika! varda (talk) 21:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Look at the page title that comes up when you search Wikipedia for Bill Niman:
Niman Ranch [edit]
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Bill Niman)
-- If you don't see this search on the page (Control+Find) for the text "redirect".
-- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 23:53, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
@Janevarda: -- I updated the above example (had typos mistakes), but should be clear now. Let me know if it's still not clear. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 03:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

18:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks for your help! I felt like I was wrangling kittens with this group. haha. And press was there so they snatched me away before I was really finished. Thanks for adding outcomes and messaging Harold, etc! Heathart (talk) 15:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Kittens! Love it! And the beer. You are so good with the WikiLUV!
Glad it went okay..... Sorry for all the logistical/end-user issues on my part. I keep forgetting time zone differences.
We have a WikiWednesday for your PRH #2 event but I can try to check in using my phone like I did last night. Will it be the same group, so they would be on-boarded already? -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Cheers! You seem like a good sort and I thought a mug of something refreshing would do you some good today. Shearonink (talk) 18:20, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, Shearonink! BrillLyle (talk) 13:55, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Bots can be a bit too literal in doing their jobs sometimes.

Hey, whatcha gonna do? HalfShadow 03:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

HalfShadow Ha! Well at least it was very thorough! :-) Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 03:22, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

meetup

Could you please take a look at articles created by yesterday's Nebraska meetup. I noticed Ying Lu, who will not pass WP:PROF, and Eliza Pickrell Routt which probably will not pass AfD, unless people really think that inclusion in that collection really proves notability . I haven't checked systematically, but I see Lucile F. Aly-- tho she is notable, that article is a preliminary draft not at all suited for mainspace. DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

@DGG: -- Yeah I was up late last night monitoring and trying to provide remote support to the Nebraska event -- support that no one responded to despite my best efforts. Was hoping to head off this issue, which I had a feeling was going to happen. And did.
Plus: I have patrol rights and didn't feel comfortable approving most of the new articles created. I tried stressing this to the leader of the meetup but it obviously didn't penetrate. Shades of Regina? I am beyond disappointed with this approach to editathons, and support any legit AfD that you think is appropriate. And you know I don't love AfD.
Honestly, new editors who work on the mainspace instead of a draft or sandbox, who copy/paste from online sources #copyvio, etc. I want to be more patient about this but it was systemic during A+F events, including this one.
I agree 1000% percent that the tragedy is that many of these people are most probably notabile but the editors are doing shoddy jobs -- or aren't being properly instructed I suspect -- on how to build even a solid stub. Blech.
Do what you think is best David. I trust and support you! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 13:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
I can and will deal with the articles--I was thinking instead of AfD,simply moving them to Draft space with an explanation with an edit summary such as "moved to draft space to avoid deletion": , but since we cannot ensure that it doesn't happen again, because anyone can run a editathon if they choose without even letting us know. I've been trying to write custom messages, but I' m going to try drafting a more or less standard fuller one that I can send to each of the people whose articles are questionable; I would also like to send a explanatory notice about them to the people who sponsored the event, or even post the problems on the event page. Who was doing this one?
But I am also concerned that of the articles from Regina that were brought to AfD, some were kept because they were unwisely defended on the basis of sentiment. I will bring a few to AfD2.
I am concerned that I have sometimes already be seen as hostile to editors at these meetup topics,which is one reason I need support. DGG ( talk ) 21:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Hey @DGG: -- I'm more than a little dismayed to see that it looks like there was some #COI editing re: Raikes entries at this event. How should this be addressed, if it should be addressed. I'm pretty peeved. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 16:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
from: http://www.dailynebraskan.com/news/wikiwarriors-event-hopes-to-add-diversity-to-wikipedia-editors/article_e84f08b4-ebf1-11e5-8478-03b79e5c8afa.html:
"Other sponsors included UNL Libraries, the Jeffrey S. Raikes School, Aspen Lincoln, Hudl, Bulu Box, the Digital Humanities Student Association, Information Technology Services, division of student affairs and departments of English and history."
I will deal with that article!. But also they deliberately concentrated on current faculty at their own university, which I already realized from the articles themselves, but wasn't sure it was planned that way Can you identify all the articles? I'm going to search for those that they didn't list, and I am going to put a " customized connected contributor tag on every one of them. This needs posting prominently, and not just here. I will post to the WP mailing list this evening--is it OK if I use both our names? And II think this belongs on the WP weekly. but in connection with Regina and others. You've got mail. DGG ( talk ) 18:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Looking again at that article, I am going to either list it for AfD, of put a G11 speedy tag on it. I would unhesitatingly use speedy, except that the afd will get more attention. DGG ( talk ) 18:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Gah! I don't like being part of deleting content but the amount of dumped information without any sort of guidance is just all sorts of bad -- and onto the main space, it's just really not okay. So I support whatever you want to do. The only concern I have is that I suspect many of these folks are _indeed_ notable and deserve solid stubs but the lack of work on the part of the editors to establish this is so poor that the entries are doing more harm to the subjects than if they didn't exist in the first place. Ugh. Thoughts?
BTW, really nice to chat for a bit IRL last night....! Important to have those kinds of in person convos! Xo -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 18:32, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
I listed the article of the school for speedy g11, and copied the usual notice onto the talk pages of the editors involved. ( Jimfbleak deleted it. I expect complaints Monday--direct them to me if you like. ) DGG ( talk ) 15:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
For the people, anyone I think likely to be notable will be moved into draft, but I'm not going to do it for a few days. DGG ( talk ) 02:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Austin event

Hello BrillLyle, I might need your help as I am creating an event. First, I am going to do my readings, but I will have some questions here and there. The first one is the following: to create a page for an upcoming edit a thon, what's the best way to proceed? I am using my sandbox to play around with an old edit a thon template. After, I am done can I just save it on my own page? Or should I do something different? Thanks, Esmeralda000 (talk) 05:11, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Esmeralda000! I started a new section since you have a question.
I would be happy to help you set up a boilerplate for your event and provide you with some information that we have found is super helpful. Wikimedia NYC has supported a lot of events remotely, so depending on when your event is and what time, if there is availability there might be remote help. If that doesn't work there are other options we can talk about.
I think you should set up your event page within the Austin Meetup space here: Wikipedia:Meetup/Austin. We typically nest each event page in the geographic bucket it belongs with -- for a full list of Meetups and editathon initiatives you can see that here: Wikipedia:Meetup
So I would move your sandbox to something like Wikipedia:Meetup/Austin/2016-04 UT-Austin Global Migration. I use dates in the page titles and a meaningful title. We can talk about if you want to do a redirect or not. And you can set up a Wikipedia shortcut to the page to help folks find the event page.
It's a GREAT idea to get people focused on signing up and using the event page as much as possible -- sort of a learning by using Wikipedia, even if it's in the event page space.
And please try and encourage new editors especially to work on existing pages that need TLC -- references and citations are a good starting point. New pages by new editors tend to get deleted if they are put up too quickly and aren't fully developed. It's just a huge problem. We can talk about this more later if you'd like.
I will make some general edits to the page you've got to steer you in the right direction -- maybe it will be helpful. Let me know -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 23:28, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Esmeralda000! To follow up, I moved your page from the Sandbox to this location: Wikipedia:Meetup/Austin/2016-04 UT-Austin Global Migration. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 00:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. You are very kind. This the first event I am organizing and there is a lot to learn. I am not planning to create pages ex-novo. I would like for us all to get acquainted with checking references, editing factual errors etc. For this reason, I am encouraging people to select for themselves articles they would want to work on prior to the event. Please, let me know how I can do a redirect. If you are busy, feel free to point me at any documentation you have. Thanks again.
Esmeralda000 (talk) 04:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Esmeralda000! I did the redirect for you. It looks like your event page is in good shape! Let me know if you have any questions.... -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 04:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks much, Erika. I will keep you posted.
Esmeralda000 (talk) 03:41, 21 March 2016
Hello, the event in Austin about Global Migration is fast approaching (next Tuesday at from 12:00 to 2:00). Can you check on us from far away? We won't be creating pages, just simple editing. Any other last minute suggestion about what works best is really appreciated. Do people like one on one support or do they prefer handouts? Thanks!!

Esmeralda000 (talk) 15:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

Louisville Event Images

Hi BrillLyle, I uploaded 11 photos of yesterday's Art+Feminism event in Louisville, tagged with Category:ArtAndFeminism 2016/Louisville. I also tried to add the photos to our Category page on Wikipedia. You'll see those links on the category page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:ArtAndFeminism_2016/Louisville Something isn't working correctly. Can you please help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saccarte (talkcontribs) 17:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Saccarte! The category should be in Wikimedia Commons instead of Wikipedia. Wikimedia Commons is the photo repository for all of the Wikimedia projects, which includes Wikipedia. So I adjusted the Commons category at the footer of the event page and made sure the photos were tagged correctly (removed the prefix Category). They should all be here: Category:ArtAndFeminism 2016/Louisville My strength is definitely not categories but let me know if you have any other questions! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 21:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
BrillLyle, thank you so much for taking the time to sort that out! Saccarte (talk) 22:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thank you for helping the Art+Feminism Louisville Wiki event from afar! Saccarte (talk) 22:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Saccarte! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 23:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

16:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

hey

Sorry about that, I didn't mean for you to stop talking entirely. I was trying to help you calm down. Being agitated is never helpful. If you come back on chat, we can try to resolve the situation. Okay? DS (talk) 21:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey DS -- I wasn't upset. I was trying to explain what happened and so far only one person on the talk page sort of got what happened. IRC seemed like another brick wall, backing up another aggressive male editor.
What happened happened quickly and under the guise of Wiki rules being thrown around. But it did happen. And it happens a lot if the page I am editing becomes higher profile like this one. I tried to discuss it reasonably with the guy and he wouldn't have a conversation with me. And wouldn't take a breath to allow anyone else in the process. So I said it like I saw it happen and he saw that as being personal.
He _did_ misbehave and was very uncivil in his behavior until I called him on what he did. Then he starts whining and saying it was personal. But no one is going to defend me or think possibly that he might be wrong, so I can just walk away -- like I kept trying to do.
I don't want to be hassled by an Admin. It seems like he's trying to get me in trouble somehow and that was my concern. You guys told me that wouldn't happen, so hopefully that will be it.
Will it help for me to go back on chat? It seems that there was really no point. There was enough "evidence" against me to paint me in the wrong here. Thoughts?
Thanks for taking the time out to write. I really appreciate it. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 21:43, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
I think it probably will help a bit; it's definitely easier to talk things out in real time. DS (talk) 21:46, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the welcome message! I appreciate it. Kjoranson (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Kjoranson! Reach out if you need anything -- get stuck, have questions, etc. -- All the best, Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 19:17, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

19:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Writing+Feminism

Hi!! Thanks so much for your edits to the Meetup page, but we have this covered! :) Megs (talk) 23:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Laila Ajjawi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you! So sweet and thoughtful of you. I'll be in touch.

Avaansari (talk) 16:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

advice about posting a draft to the main site

Hi BrillLyle
I would love some advice. For some reason I couldn't figure out how to create a new page in my sandbox and created it as a draft instead. Can you tell me how I should proceed from here? Do I need to submit it for review since it was created as a draft? I am happy to do so, but it says there are 400 articles waiting for review so I expect this will take some time.
I would very much appreciate any advice you can give me.
Many thanks Howenow12 (talk) 21:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

@Howenow12: Hello there! As you might have noticed, I tried to do a bit of cleaning up of the entry you are working on, Draft:Allen Hickling. I think that the entry still needs to have additional citations to establish the subject's notability. Do you feel comfortable going over the page history to see what changes I made and then maybe we can work on tightening up the page and finding good citations? I don't know much about the sectors he is an expert in, but would like to assist if I can. Sorry for the delay in responding. Best, Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 21:18, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Erika, thanks so much for getting back to me, I really appreciate it! I am still getting used to navigating around Wikipedia so if this isn't the correct way to reply to you please let me know. Thank you very much for taking a look at the page I am working on, you are very kind - I know it has a lot of issues, but I really want to get it right - I have no interest in putting a page up that isn't acceptable to Wikipedia. The edits you have made look great. Which are the parts that concern you the most? I am hopeful with more work I will be able to make the page robust enough to publish. I have three more citations which I am just about to add. Thanks again Gen AKA Howenow12 (talk) 01:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)





22:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to A+F

Thank you for participating

Over 800 new articles were created in connection with Art and Feminism

Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon

(check out our next event Women writers worldwide online edit-a-thon)

--Ipigott (talk) 13:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)