User talk:CHR52

Behavior towards editors[edit]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Phonet (talk) 22:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello racist. You had better see a mirror. Never come here, Please. Mr. racist. -CHR52 (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --Phonet (talk) 23:23, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your behavior towards editors. --Phonet (talk) 23:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are mocking the Japanese academy. Leave. Mr.Racist. -CHR52 (talk) 00:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not, and I didn't. Also I'm not a Mr. --Phonet (talk) 01:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not write here, Please. -CHR52 (talk) 03:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks, such as calling another editor racist, damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. This is your final warning, if you keep calling other users racist, you may be blocked from editing. Tornado chaser (talk) 02:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Phonet said "Well, Japanese academic societies aren't the only academia in the world." This is racial discrimination. Are you taunting Japanese academies? -03:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What we've got here is failure to communicate... What you just wrote looks like you're suggesting that Japanese academic societies are the only academia in the world. That's far from true, and it makes you seem like a racist. As User:Phonet politely explained to you, seek assistance from your embassy.

_Edit: Of course, I'm not implying that you are a racist, I'm assuming good faith that this is just a misunderstanding. You should do the same when you are in a discussion with other editors. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 04:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That is your subjectivity. If not, please "amendment" Japanese Wikipedia.-CHR52 (talk) 04:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is English Wikipedia. Japanese Wikipedia is a separate project. You are free to contribute there. (Edit: You are free to contribute here too, of course, but stop this kind of WP:PA) BytEfLUSh ^Talk 04:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is sophistry. Japan planted pears in Korea in the 1930s.Do you know? -CHR52 (talk) 04:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please continue the discussion here: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:CHR52

This is about your behavior, not content disputes. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 04:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Korea's Niitaka pear was developed by Japan in 1927. Niitaka is the most produced pear in Korea. Did you know that? -CHR52 (talk) 04:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know that there is an AN/I case that involves you? Wikipedia is not a reliable source, btw. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 04:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pears are only Japanese, Chinese and European varieties. "Korean pear" does not exist in terms of DNA. It is academically proven. Did you know that? -CHR52 (talk) 04:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm out. Good luck, I was just trying to point out what you should, and what you shouldn't do, but this is like listening to a broken record. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 04:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Call good-faith editors racists again and your next block will be much longer. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:40, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets[edit]

Hi, are you the same person as 789XYG? You cannot use several accounts, see WP:SOCKPUPPETS. Using different accounts to edit war is even worse. Thanks. Mr.choppers | ✎ 19:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for introducing yourself.CHR52 (talk) 04:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alto image - thank you[edit]

Thank you for the blue image on the Suzuki Alto article. After a rocky start, this is a good image. Stepho talk 22:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Azukimonaka per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azukimonaka. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for introducing about yourself.CHR52 (talk) 19:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]