User talk:Campista1891

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Campista1891, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Four-day week. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Jc3s5h. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Calendar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Note that sources mentioned in edit summaries do not fulfill the requirement to cite sources to support claims because these edit summaries cannot be readily found by readers. Citations are required to support challenged material by the "Verifiability" policy, and according to the "Citing sources" guideline the citations should follow the same style as the sources already in the article. Jc3s5h (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 17:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Pulse (nightclub), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 17:09, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Western Europe. General Ization ^Talk 17:09, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at World war. General Ization ^Talk 21:24, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Calendar. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 21:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sabbath. Home Lander (talk) 16:09, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to place one here for the Iranian Revolution revert, but it appears that you have been notified. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 01:03, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to your unsourced edit to "Islam and war" here. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Western Europe. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Joobo (talk) 09:19, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 19:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Juantheman96, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Sjö (talk) 20:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]