User talk:Carliandteresa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Carliandteresa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Christa Black, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Christa Black, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This conduct will not be tolerated under any circumstances whatsoever. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 22:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Up and coming" artists rarely have achieved enough notability (yet) to merit an article of their own. Please familiarize yourself with these policies. If you feel that Black meets these requirements, you may post this article again, with proper references so that editors can verify what you say. Otherwise, the article will likely be deleted again. And under no circumstances whatsoever are you to engage in the name-calling that you did on my talk page, or you will be swiftly blocked from further editing. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 22:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, it appears that you did try to post this again, and it wasdeleted again as promotion of a non-notable musician. I will add that I am not the one who actually deletes the article. I merely flag it for deletion, and an administrator has to agree with my assessment for it to actually be taken down. You might want to have a word with Tnxman307, who actually took down the article twice, anout why he or she did so. But be civil when you do. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 22:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]