User talk:Chane 815

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problems with File:Hannah Montana cast 2.png[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Hannah Montana cast 2.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://l.yimg.com/l/tv/us/img/site/81/37/0000058137_20090611175708.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Hannah Montana cast 2.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Hannah Montana cast 2.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 19:41, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for File:Hannah Montana cast 2.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hannah Montana cast 2.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 05:55, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alex Russo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alex Russo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alex Russo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alex Russo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking[edit]

Please note that we generally link only the first occurrence of a term, as per WP:REPEATLINK. There is no point linking to every occurrence as you've been doing at Hannah Montana (season 4). Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (linking) for more information. --AussieLegend (talk) 08:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Template:Disney XD worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. ETLamborghini (talk) 15:27, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Template:Disney XD, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ETLamborghini (talk) 01:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Montana[edit]

I have reverted your changes to Hannah Montana again. As I indicated in my last edit summary, removal of the valid information was not explained and "Returning series" is all that is needed. It is not necessary to explain in the infobox, which is simply supposed to summarise the article, that this is the last season. Moving images to the left breaks text flow and is undesirable in any article. Please do not make these changes again without discussing it on the talk page. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hannah Montana 4.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hannah Montana 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 09:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC) I want to use the image Hannah Montana 4.jpg in Vietnamese Wikipedia. Hoangquan hientrang 15:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoangquan hientrang (talkcontribs) [reply]

License tagging for File:Disney channel Logo 2010.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Disney channel Logo 2010.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Adam Irigoyen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 04:14, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page List of iCarly episodes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. 1exec1 (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Icarly[edit]

Why are you deleting episodes of iCarly, with no explanation?--intelati(Call) 19:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to The Suite Life Movie has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ttonyb (talk) 19:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Please try to avoid edits such as this, which reintroduced a number of errors and inconsistencies that had been corrected. It appears that you reverted the article back to this version from four days ago, before making some changes that could easily have been made to the current version.[1] AussieLegend (talk) 06:16, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disney's friends for change cast.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disney's friends for change cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:10, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 02:49, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disney channel Logo 2010.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disney channel Logo 2010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PPP[edit]

[2] This seems to have removed some three months of edits to the article. Please be careful. Gimmetoo (talk) 18:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, there are different measures of viewership. Nearly all the disney articles are written to say something equivalent to "on the night of its premiere, it received X viewers". The stats in the articles correspond to this text. The numbers you keep changing do not - they are a different measure, a different statistic, that corresponds to viewers over a longer period than one night. Therefore, they do not correspond to the preview in a simple way. Please stop changing these numbers. Also, you are not simply changing these numbers, but also reverting back to your older version, which removes other improvements to the article. Gimmetoo (talk) 00:06, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed an edit from an IP address identical to one of the edits you've been making changing premiere viewer numbers, and it was a revert back many days. If that was you, please stop and discuss your edits from now on, or you and these IP address may start getting blocked. Gimmetoo (talk) 02:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs[edit]

As per Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources#Self-published sources (online and paper), blogs are not generally reliable sources. This is especially true in the case where the blogs author admits to being anonymous, as is the case with travisyanan.blogspot.com. Regardless of whether the content on such sites seems to be, or actually is, correct, it can not be used in citations. This is why this edit was reverted. It should not have been restored.[3] --AussieLegend (talk) 12:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Sonny with a Chance (season 2) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 22:09, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Hannah_Montana_4.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Hannah_Montana_4.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 23:37, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disney's friends for change cast.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disney's friends for change cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 14:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Randy Cunningham: 9th Grade Ninja, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Action, Scott Thomas and John Oliver (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:36, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Disney XD Original Movies has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Cyan Gardevoir (used EDIT!) 03:14, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Capra (band) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capra (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capra (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 11:26, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]