User talk:CharlesFosterKane123
I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly.
Additional tips[edit]
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
- You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only.
- You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
- If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
- If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
Happy Wiki-ing. —Kf4bdy talk contribs
PS: This is not a bot and you did nothing to prompt this message. This is just a friendly welcome by a fellow Wikipedian.
Warning for continued disruption[edit]
As you are aware, we held a long discussion concerning the perceived "dispute" about Reed, Welles and The Third Man. Consensus opinion among all the other editors was that it had been shown false and should be described as a popular misconception. Furthermore, the placement of the term "disputed" on templates and articles is wrong. Your continued edits from an IP address [1] [2] [3] [4] to return "disputed" to the templates and articles against consensus are considered disruptive. Using an IP address to circumvent consensus is sockpuppetry and also a problem. If you persist, you will be blocked from further editing. Wikipedia functions through cooperative effort and consensus opinion -- despite individual personal POV. Please drop the disruptive behavior and move onto other more constructive editing. — CactusWriter | needles 06:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)