User talk:Charles Austin Miller

Charles Austin Miller, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Charles Austin Miller! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Charles Austin Miller, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nat Gertler (talk) 01:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Marie Yovanovitch, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've got me fucked up with somebody else, bro. I just saw this notice for the first time, and I have no idea who you or Marie Yovanovitch are. I've never seen or heard of her, and I never touched her page. Somebody is fucking with both of us, apparently. Charles Austin Miller (talk) 07:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iraq and weapons of mass destruction. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Also, please use accurate edit summaries. "Corrected typos" is not an accurate edit summary for substantially changing the meaning of sentences. Kaldari (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When your original entry is substantially and factually in error, bordering on propaganda, I will correct it. If my edits are considered vandalism, then your entries should be considered historical revision. Charles Austin Miller (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]