User talk:Chobomal

Helo I am from chocobol which small city in kazjehsi :D :D

Bcoz always friendly to every1

September 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Apap04. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Australian white ibis— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. apap04^talk^|^{contributions} 22:32, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Australian white ibis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. apap04^talk^|^{contributions} 22:35, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mandela and Tambo, you may be blocked from editing. Bahudhara (talk) 14:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chobomal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not sure why I have been blocked from editing for 'Vandalism', could someone please show what edits were classified as 'Vandalism? Cheers. 17:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.